Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340530›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2021

Neuronal activity associated with cocaine preference: Effects of differential cocaine intake.

Jonathan J Chow, Rebecca S Hofford, Joshua S Beckmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan J ChowDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 741 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.chow@uky.edu.
Rebecca S HoffordDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA. Electronic address: rebecca.hofford@mssm.edu.
Joshua S BeckmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 741 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. Electronic address: joshua.beckmann@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Training in Drug Abuse Related Research.T32DA016176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2004 to 2020
$4.0M
A translational determination of the mechanisms of maladaptive choice in cocaine use disorderR01DA045023 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA, LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Tonic and Phasic Glutamate Release in Incentive Salience and Cocaine ReinforcemenR00DA033373 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA · 2014 to 2016
$741k
Tonic and Phasic Glutamate Release in Incentive Salience and Cocaine ReinforcemenK99DA033373 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA · 2012 to 2013
$263k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA033373NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA033373NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045023NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in overall cocaine intake can directly affect neuroadaptations, and this relationship can make it difficult to interpret neurobiological changes seen in drug-choice studies, since drug intake varies between subjects. Herein, a choice procedure that controls for cocaine intake was utilized to explore if neuronal activity, measured as cFos expression in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc), was reflective of preference. Results demonstrated that cFos expression, in both the OFC and NAc, was independent of cocaine preference when cocaine intake was kept constant across individuals. However, when cocaine intake was systematically varied, the expression of cFos associated with cocaine preference was related to overall cocaine intake in the OFC, but not the NAc. Altogether, these results demonstrate that cocaine intake during choice can affect neurobiological outcome measures; thus, the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying cocaine preference may be better isolated when controlling for cocaine frequency and intake. In all, some caution is warranted when interpreting results from choice studies evaluating the neurobehavioral mechanisms that underlie drug preference when drug frequency and intake are uncontrolled, and future research is needed to determine the role of drug frequency and intake on neurobiological measures associated with drug choice.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsBrainChoice BehaviorCocaineConditioning, OperantMaleNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationCocaineChoiceCocaineDecision-makingImmunohistochemistryIn situ hybridization

Identifiers

PMID33340530
PMCPMC7855768
OpenAlexW3112357481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.