Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340519›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2021

Subtle Influence of ACE2 Glycan Processing on SARS-CoV-2 Recognition.

Joel D Allen, Yasunori Watanabe, Himanshi Chawla, Maddy L Newby, Max Crispin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Role of Host Cell Glycans on Virus Infectivity: The SARS-CoV-2 Case.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel D AllenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Yasunori WatanabeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK; Division of Structural Biology, University of Oxford, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
Himanshi ChawlaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Maddy L NewbySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Max CrispinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. Electronic address: max.crispin@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Identification of neutralizing epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike for design of vaccines and small-molecule antiviralsUM1AI144462 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 2019 to 2025
$201.6M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection is highly variable and yet the molecular basis for this effect remains elusive. One potential contribution are differences in the glycosylation of target human cells, particularly as SARS-CoV-2 has the capacity to bind sialic acid which is a common, and highly variable, terminal modification of glycans. The viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 and the human cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) are both densely glycosylated. We therefore sought to investigate whether the glycosylation state of ACE2 impacts the interaction with SARS-CoV-2 viral spike. We generated a panel of engineered ACE2 glycoforms which were analyzed by mass spectrometry to reveal the site-specific glycan modifications. We then probed the impact of ACE2 glycosylation on S binding and revealed a subtle sensitivity with hypersialylated or oligomannose-type glycans slightly impeding the interaction. In contrast, deglycosylation of ACE2 did not influence SARS-CoV-2 binding. Overall, ACE2 glycosylation does not significantly influence viral spike binding. We suggest that any role of glycosylation in the pathobiology of SARS-CoV-2 will lie beyond its immediate impact of receptor glycosylation on virus binding.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2COVID-19GlycosylationHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansModels, MolecularPolysaccharidesProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2PolysaccharidesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2glycan engineeringglycosylationSARS-CoV-2surface plasmon resonance

Identifiers

PMID33340519
PMCPMC7744274
OpenAlexW3112417624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.