Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340512›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2021

Physiological electric fields induce directional migration of mammalian cranial neural crest cells.

Abijeet Singh Mehta, Pin Ha, Kan Zhu, ShiYu Li, Kang Ting, Chia Soo, Xinli Zhang, Min Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abijeet Singh MehtaDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, Institute for Regenerative Cures, Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Suite 1630, Room 1617, 2921 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Pin HaSection of Orthodontics, Division of Growth and Development, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kan ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, Institute for Regenerative Cures, Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Suite 1630, Room 1617, 2921 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
ShiYu LiDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, Institute for Regenerative Cures, Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Suite 1630, Room 1617, 2921 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Kang TingSection of Orthodontics, Division of Growth and Development, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chia SooDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Xinli ZhangSection of Orthodontics, Division of Growth and Development, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: xzhang@dentistry.ucla.edu.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, Institute for Regenerative Cures, Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Suite 1630, Room 1617, 2921 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: minzhao@ucdavis.edu.
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
Dual roles of Nell-1 in craniofacial bones and brain through interaction with Cntnap4R01DE029353 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SOO, CHIA, ZHANG, XINLI · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
NELL-1's functional role in cartilage regenerationR01AR068835 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EASLEY, JEREMIAH, SOO, CHIA · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NELL-1 Systemic Therapy for OsteoporosisR01AR066782 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EASLEY, JEREMIAH, TING, KANG · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066782NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068835NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE029353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During neurulation, cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs) migrate long distances from the neural tube to their terminal site of differentiation. The pathway traveled by the CNCCs defines the blueprint for craniofacial construction, abnormalities of which contribute to three-quarters of human birth defects. Biophysical cues like naturally occurring electric fields (EFs) have been proposed to be one of the guiding mechanisms for CNCC migration from the neural tube to identified position in the branchial arches. Such endogenous EFs can be mimicked by applied EFs of physiological strength that has been reported to guide the migration of amphibian and avian neural crest cells (NCCs), namely galvanotaxis or electrotaxis. However, the behavior of mammalian NCCs in external EFs has not been reported. We show here that mammalian CNCCs migrate towards the anode in direct current (dc) EFs. Reversal of the field polarity reverses the directedness. The response threshold was below 30 ​mV/mm and the migration directedness and displacement speed increased with increase in field strength. Both CNCC line (O9-1) and primary mouse CNCCs show similar galvanotaxis behavior. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the mammalian CNCCs respond to physiological EFs by robust directional migration towards the anode in a voltage-dependent manner.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell MovementElectricitySignal TransductionAnimalsBranchial RegionCell LineMiceNeural CrestCranial neural crest cellsDirectional cell migrationsElectric fieldsElectrotaxisGalvanotaxisMouseO9-1

Identifiers

PMID33340512
PMCPMC7856271
OpenAlexW3114142629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.