Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340411›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2021

FIGO good clinical practice paper: management of the second stage of labor.

Alison Wright, Anwar H Nassar, Gerry Visser, Diana Ramasauskaite, Gerhard Theron, FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A comparison in maternal and neonatal outcomes between mild fundal pressure and vacuum extraction for shortening the second stage of labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  15. Episiotomy: Are Indian Obstetricians Getting the Angle Right?Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison WrightDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free London Teaching Hospital, London, UK.
Anwar H NassarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gerry VisserDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Diana RamasauskaiteCenter of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gerhard TheronDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health CommitteeInternational Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This good clinical practice paper provides an overview of the current evidence around second stage care, highlighting the challenges and the importance of maintaining high-quality, safe, and respectful care in all settings. It includes a series of recommendations based on best available evidence regarding length of second stage, judicious use of episiotomy, and the importance of competent attendants and adequate resource to facilitate all aspects of second stage management, from physiological birth to assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean at full dilatation. The second stage of labor is potentially the most dangerous time for the baby and can have significant consequences for the mother, including death or severe perineal trauma or fistula, especially where there are failures to recognize and repair. This paper sets out principles of care, including the vital role of skilled birth attendants and birth companions, and the importance of obstetricians and midwives working together effectively and speaking with one voice, whether to women or to policy makers. The optimization of high-quality, safe, and personalized care in the second stage of labor for all women globally can only be achieved by appropriate attention to the training of birth attendants, midwives, and obstetricians. FIGO is committed to this aim alongside the WHO, ICM, and all FIGO's 132 member societies.

Indexed as

Labor Stage, SecondDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansMidwiferyParturitionPregnancybirthcesareandeliveryfistulae preventionforcepsimpacted fetal headperinatalphysiological birthqualityrespectful maternity caresafetysecond stage of laborvacuum

Identifiers

PMID33340411
PMCPMC7898872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.