Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340331›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2021

The immunologic tumor microenvironment in endometrioid endometrial cancer in the morphomolecular context: mutual correlations and prognostic impact depending on molecular alterations.

Barbara Willvonseder, Fabian Stögbauer, Katja Steiger, Moritz Jesinghaus, Peer-Hendrik Kuhn, Christine Brambs, Jutta Engel, Holger Bronger, Georg Philipp Schmidt, Bernhard Haller and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara Willvonseder *Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Fabian Stögbauer *Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Peer-Hendrik KuhnInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Christine BrambsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jutta EngelMunich Cancer Registry, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Holger BrongerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg Philipp SchmidtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard HallerInstitute for Epidemiology and Statistics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Gisela KellerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Aurelia NoskeInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Nicole PfarrInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Melanie BoxbergInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Trogerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany. Melanie.Boxberg@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-7922
Technical University of Munich · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePOLE-mutant, microsatellite-instable (MSI), p53-mutant and non-specific molecular profile (NSMP) are TCGA-defined molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer (EC). Hypothesizing that morphology and tumor immunology might differ depending on molecular background concerning composition and prognostic impact, we aimed to comprehensively interconnect morphologic, immunologic and molecular data.

methodsTCGA-defined molecular groups were determined by immunohistochemistry and sequencing in n = 142 endometrioid EC. WHO-defined histopathological grading was performed. The immunologic microenvironment (iTME) was characterised by the quantification of intraepithelial and stromal populations of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL: overall T-cells; T-Killer cells; regulatory T-cells (Treg)). Immunologic parameters were correlated with WHO-grading, TCGA-subgroups and prognosis.

resultsHigh density TIL were significantly more frequent in high-grade (G3) compared to low-grade (G1/2) EC in the whole cohort and in the subgroup of POLE-wildtype-/microsatellite-stable-EC. MSI was associated with high-level TIL-infiltration when taking into account the type of mismatch repair defect (MLH1/PMS2; MSH2/MSH6). Prognostic impact of biomarkers depended on molecular subgroups: In p53-mutant EC, Treg were independently prognostic, in NSMP, the unique independently prognostic biomarker was WHO-grading.

conclusionsEC morphology and immunology differ depending on genetics. Our study delineated two molecularly distinct subgroups of immunogenic EC characterized by high-density TIL-infiltration: MSI EC and high-grade POLE-wildtype/microsatellite-stable-EC. Prognostic impact of TIL-populations relied on TCGA-subgroups indicating specific roles for TIL depending on molecular background. In NSMP, histopathological grading was the only prognostic biomarker demonstrating the relevance of WHO-grading in an era of molecular subtyping.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorEndometrioid endometrial cancerImmunologic microenvironmentMolecular subgroupsPrognostic impact

Identifiers

PMID33340331
PMCPMC8139910
OpenAlexW3113861260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.