Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340284›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Twenty-four-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of extending antiretroviral therapy refills in ART adherence clubs.

Tali Cassidy, Anna Grimsrud, Claire Keene, Keitumetse Lebelo, Helen Hayes, Catherine Orrell, Nompumelelo Zokufa, Tabitha Mutseyekwa, Jacqueline Voget, Rodd Gerstenhaber and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tali CassidyMédecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1268-3331
Anna GrimsrudInternational AIDS Society, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-8377
Claire KeeneMédecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0875-5884
Keitumetse LebeloMédecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Helen HayesWestern Cape Government Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
Catherine OrrellDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-7475
Nompumelelo ZokufaMédecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Tabitha MutseyekwaMédecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Jacqueline VogetWestern Cape Government Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rodd GerstenhaberMédecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Lynne WilkinsonInternational AIDS Society, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-8719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence club (AC) model has supported clinically stable HIV patients' retention with group ART refills and psychosocial support. Reducing visit frequency by increasing ART refills to six months could further benefit patients and unburden health systems. We conducted a pragmatic non-inferiority cluster randomized trial comparing standard of care (SoC) ACs and six-month refill intervention ACs in a primary care facility in Khayelitsha, South Africa.

methodsExisting community-based and facility-based ACs were randomized to either SoC or intervention ACs. SoC ACs met five times annually, receiving two-month refills with a four-month refill over year-end. Blood was drawn at one AC visit with a clinical assessment at the next. Intervention ACs met twice annually receiving six-month refills, with an individual blood collection visit before the annual clinical assessment AC visit. The first study visits were in October and November 2017 and participants followed for 27 months. We report retention in care, viral load completion and viral suppression (<400 copies/mL) 24 months after enrolment and calculated intention-to-treat risk differences for the primary outcomes using generalized estimating equations specifying for clustering by AC.

resultsOf 2150 participants included in the trial, 977 were assigned to the intervention arm (40 ACs) and 1173 to the SoC (48 ACs). Patient characteristics at enrolment were similar across groups. Retention in care at 24 months was similarly high in both arms: 93.6% (1098/1173) in SoC and 92.6% (905/977) in the intervention arm, with a risk difference of -1.0% (95% CI: -3.2 to 1.3). The intervention arm had higher viral load completion (90.8% (999/1173) versus 85.1% (887/977)) and suppression (87.3% (969 /1173) versus 82.6% (853/977)) at 24 months, with a risk difference for completion of 5.5% (95% CI: 1.5 to 9.5) and suppression of 4.6% (95% CI: 0.2 to 9.0).

conclusionsIntervention AC patients receiving six-month ART refills showed non-inferior retention in care, viral load completion and viral load suppression to those in SoC ACs, adding to a growing literature showing good outcomes with extended ART dispensing intervals.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsViral LoadAnti-HIV Agentsadherence clubsART retention in caredifferentiated service deliveryHIVmulti-month dispensingpatient-centred

Identifiers

PMID33340284
PMCPMC7749539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.