ArticleBiotechnology journal2021
Error propagation in constraint-based modeling of Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Article in Biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- How reliable are Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell genome-scale metabolic models?Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2023Article
- Genome-scale models as a vehicle for knowledge transfer from microbial to mammalian cell systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Inclusion of maintenance energy improves the intracellular flux predictions of CHO.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Error propagation in constraint-based modeling of Chinese hamster ovary cells.Biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are the most popular mammalian cell factories for the production of glycosylated biopharmaceuticals. To further increase titer and productivity and ensure product quality, rational system-level engineering strategies based on constraint-based metabolic modeling, such as flux balance analysis (FBA), have gained strong interest. However, the quality of FBA predictions depends on the accuracy of the experimental input data, especially on the exchange rates of extracellular metabolites. Yet, it is not standard practice to devote sufficient attention to the accurate determination of these rates. In this work, we investigated to what degree the sampling frequency during a batch culture and the measurement errors of metabolite concentrations influence the accuracy of the calculated exchange rates and further, how this error then propagates into FBA predictions of growth rates. We determined that accurate measurements of essential amino acids with low uptake rates are crucial for the accuracy of FBA predictions, followed by a sufficient number of analyzed time points. We observed that the measured difference in growth rates of two cell lines can only be reliably predicted when both high measurement accuracy and sampling frequency are ensured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.