Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340201›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2021

The Beliefs About Breastfeeding Questionnaire (BAB-Q): A psychometric validation study.

Philippa Davie, Debra Bick, Joseph Chilcot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philippa DavieHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7788-3145
Debra BickProfessor of Clinical Trials in Maternal Health, Warwick Medical School, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-7276
Joseph ChilcotHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6427-4690
Guy's Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesQuestionnaires used to assess women's beliefs as a predictor of breastfeeding behaviour are not theoretically informed or tested for psychometric validity and reliability. This study conducted a psychometric evaluation of the Beliefs About Breastfeeding Questionnaire (BAB-Q).

designA two-phase evaluation in an online cross-sectional questionnaire study (N = 278) and cohort study sample (N = 264). A ten-item questionnaire was proposed to assess women's beliefs about the benefits and efforts of breastfeeding.

methodsExploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed construct validity and reliability. Multivariate regression analyses assessed validity in predicting breastfeeding behaviour and experiences.

resultsEFA found a shortened 8-item, 2-factor model had good fit (χ

conclusionsThe eight-item questionnaire showed good model fit with acceptable loadings, and good reliability for all subscales. The utility of the BAB-Q at predicting breastfeeding behaviour remains unclear and unsupported by empirical evidence. Further assessments of the predictive validity of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies with diverse beliefs and infant feeding practices are required.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesbeliefsbreastfeedingbreastfeeding experiencehealth behaviourpsychometric validationquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID33340201
PMCPMC8247407
OpenAlexW3112831733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.