Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340022›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2021

Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19.

Lianpan Dai, George F Gao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05162482 (Immunogenicity and Safety of Heterologous Combinations of COVID-19 Vaccines Available Under Emergency Use Authorization in Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 659 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
659citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05162482 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Immunogenicity and Safety of Heterologous Combinations of COVID-19 Vaccines Available Under Emergency Use Authorization in Pakistan: A Randomized Phase II Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAga Khan University Hospital, PakistanRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,680ConditionsCOVID 19 VaccineArmsBIBP (CNBG, Sinopharm) WIV, CanSinoBIO, AstraZeneca ChAdOx
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

659 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

599 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lianpan DaiCAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. dailp@im.ac.cn.
George F GaoCAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. gaof@im.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3869-615X
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are urgently needed to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to help the return to pre-pandemic normalcy. A great many vaccine candidates are being developed, several of which have completed late-stage clinical trials and are reporting positive results. In this Progress article, we discuss which viral elements are used in COVID-19 vaccine candidates, why they might act as good targets for the immune system and the implications for protective immunity.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Viral ProteinsAntigens, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33340022
PMCPMC7747004
OpenAlexW3117730334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.