Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340009›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2021

Systems biology in cardiovascular disease: a multiomics approach.

Abhishek Joshi, Marieke Rienks, Konstantinos Theofilatos, Manuel Mayr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Glutamine Metabolism in Cardiac Hypertrophy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Proteomics profiling for cardiovascular risk prediction: transforming clinical care.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abhishek JoshiKing's British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Marieke RienksKing's British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0590-9518
Konstantinos TheofilatosKing's British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-0553
Manuel MayrKing's British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, London, UK. manuel.mayr@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-829X

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/16/3/32406British Heart Foundation FS/16/32/32184British Heart Foundation PG/17/48/32956British Heart Foundation RG/16/14/32397British Heart Foundation SP/17/10/33219British Heart Foundation SP/19/4/34677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omics techniques generate large, multidimensional data that are amenable to analysis by new informatics approaches alongside conventional statistical methods. Systems theories, including network analysis and machine learning, are well placed for analysing these data but must be applied with an understanding of the relevant biological and computational theories. Through applying these techniques to omics data, systems biology addresses the problems posed by the complex organization of biological processes. In this Review, we describe the techniques and sources of omics data, outline network theory, and highlight exemplars of novel approaches that combine gene regulatory and co-expression networks, proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics and phenomics with informatics techniques to provide new insights into cardiovascular disease. The use of systems approaches will become necessary to integrate data from more than one omic technique. Although understanding the interactions between different omics data requires increasingly complex concepts and methods, we argue that hypothesis-driven investigations and independent validation must still accompany these novel systems biology approaches to realize their full potential.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesComputational BiologyMachine LearningGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHumansLipidomicsMetabolomicsNeural Networks, ComputerProteomicsSystems Biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.