Observational studyPediatric research2021
Establishing reference ranges of cord blood: point-of-care hemostatic function assessment in preterm and term neonates.
Observational study in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coagulation dysfunction in term neonatal sepsis: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Comparison of standard and global hemostasis assays in cord and peripheral blood of newborns.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Coagulation assay results at birth in preterm infants: A cohort study highlighting the relevance of local reference values for interpretation.Vox sanguinis · 2025Article
- TEGDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThrombelastometry, allowing timely assessment of global hemostatic function, is increasingly used to guide hemostatic interventions in bleeding patients. Reference values are available for adults and children, including infants but not neonates immediately after birth.
methodsNeonates were grouped as preterm (30 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks/days) and term (37 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks/days). Blood samples were drawn from the umbilical cord immediately after cesarean section and analyzed by thrombelastometry. Reference ranges were determined for the extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways, fibrin polymerization, and hyperfibrinolysis detection.
resultsAll extrinsically activated test parameters, but maximum lysis (P = 0.139) differed significantly between both groups (P ≤ 0.001). Maximum clot firmness in the fibrin polymerization test was comparable (P = 0.141). All intrinsically activated test parameters other than coagulation time (P = 0.537) and maximum lysis (P = 0.888) differed significantly (P < 0.001), and so did all aprotinin-related test parameters (P ≤ 0.001) but maximum lysis (P = 0.851).
conclusionsThis is the first study to identify reference ranges for thrombelastometry in preterm and term neonates immediately after birth. We also report differences in clot initiation and clot strength in neonates born <37 versus ≤40 weeks of gestation, mirroring developmental hemostasis. IMPACT: Impact: This prospective observational study is the first to present reference ranges in preterm and term infants for all types of commercially available tests of thrombelastometry, notably also including the fibrin polymerization test. IMPORTANCE: Viscoelastic coagulation assays such as thrombelastometry have become integral to the management of perioperative bleeding by present-day standards. Reference values are available for adults, children, and infants but not for neonates. Key message: Clot initiation and formation was faster and clot strength higher in the term than in the preterm group. Parameters of thrombelastometry obtained from cord blood do not apply interchangeably to preterm and term neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.