Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339900›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2021

Scoring system for clinically significant CMV infection in seropositive recipients following allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant: an SFGM-TC study.

David Beauvais, Elodie Drumez, Didier Blaise, Régis Peffault de Latour, Edouard Forcade, Patrice Ceballos, Anne Uyttebroeck, Hélène Labussière, Stéphanie Nguyen, Jean-Henri Bourhis and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

David BeauvaisDepartment of Hematology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-828X
Elodie DrumezULR 2694-METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Univ Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Didier BlaiseDepartment of Hematology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-9447
Régis Peffault de LatourHematology Transplant Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Edouard ForcadeService d'hematologie et therapie cellulaire, CHU Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8873-2868
Patrice CeballosHematology Department, Saint-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Anne UyttebroeckDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hélène LabussièreDepartment of Hematology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Stéphanie NguyenDepartment of Hematology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France.
Jean-Henri BourhisDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Patrice ChevallierDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Anne ThiebautHematology Department, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Xavier PoiréSection of Hematology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1897-0227
Sébastien MauryHematology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France.
Eric DeconinckHematology Department, University Hospital, Besançon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6006-8088
Thomas CluzeauService d'Hématologie Clinique, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Eolia BrissotDepartment of Hematology, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France.
Anne HuynhCHU-Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole (IUCT-O), Toulouse, France.
Marie-Thérèse RubioUniversity Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
Alain DuhamelULR 2694-METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Univ Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Ibrahim Yakoub-AghaDepartment of Hematology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France. ibrahim.yakoubagha@chru-lille.fr.
Université de Lille · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRSorbonne Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to identify cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive patients who are at risk of developing CMV infection following first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), we built up a scoring system based on patient/donor characteristics and transplantation modalities. To this end, 3690 consecutive patients were chronologically divided into a derivation cohort (2010-2012, n = 2180) and a validation cohort (2013-2014, n = 1490). Haploidentical donors were excluded. The incidence of first clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or CMV viremia leading to preemptive treatment) at 1, 3, and 6 months in the derivation cohort was 13.8%, 38.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. CMV-seropositive donor, unrelated donor (HLA matched 10/10 or HLA mismatched 9/10), myeloablative conditioning, total body irradiation, antithymocyte globulin, and mycophenolate mofetil significantly and independently affected the incidence of 3-month infection. These six factors were selected to build up the prognostic model. Four risk groups were defined: low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk categories, with a 3-month predicted incidence of first clinically significant CMV infection in the derivation cohort of 22.2%, 31.1%, 45.4%, and 56.9%, respectively. This score represents a framework for the evaluation of patients who are at risk of developing clinically significant CMV infection following allo-HCT. Prospective studies using this score may be of benefit in assessing the value of anti-CMV prophylaxis in well-defined patient cohorts.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAntiviral AgentsCytomegalovirusHumansProspective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID33339900
OpenAlexW3114210220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.