Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339890›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Ecological responses to flow variation inform river dolphin conservation.

Shambhu Paudel, John L Koprowski, Usha Thakuri, Rajesh Sigdel, Ram Chandra Gautam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Time-varying flow-ecology relationships for an endangered fish population: Longfin Smelt in the San Francisco Estuary.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. The role of HOXA1 in cancer and targeted therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shambhu PaudelSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, 1064 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. spaudel@email.arizona.edu.
John L KoprowskiSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, 1064 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Usha ThakuriInstitute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Rajesh SigdelInstitute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal.
Ram Chandra GautamVyas Municipality, Government of Nepal, Tanahun, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University · NPUniversity of Arizona · USGovernment of Nepal · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many environmental flow (e-flow) studies and applications have predominantly used state-(i.e., at a single time point) and rate-(i.e., temporal change) based demographic characteristics of species representing lower trophic levels (e.g., fish communities) to build flow-ecology relationships, rather than using a process that incorporates population dynamics. Recent studies have revealed the importance of incorporating data on species traits when building flow-ecology relationships. The effects of flow on keystone megafauna species (i.e., body mass ≥ 30 kg) reverberate through entire food webs; however, the relationships between flow and these species are not well understood, limiting the scope of the relationships used in flow management. Here, we fill this gap by incorporating the habitat selection traits at different flows of a freshwater apex predator, Ganges River dolphin (GRD, Platanista gangetica gangetica), which plays a significant role in maintaining the structure, functions and integrity of the aquatic ecosystem. Using temporally and spatially measured GRD habitat selection traits, we quantified flow-ecology responses in the Karnali River of Nepal during the low-flow season when habitat was heavily reduced and water demand was highest. We define ecological responses as suitable habitat templates with enough usable surface area to support GRD fitness by improving reproduction and survival. We measured the available and occupied habitats to develop flow-ecology responses. Variation in flow resulted in substantial differences in the ecological response across time and space, suggesting that aquatic species adjusted in a variety of habitats to support their life histories and maintain viable populations. The limited availability of suitable habitats combined with uninformed water regulations by humans likely places GRDs under severe physiological stress during low-water seasons (i.e., January-April), suggesting that  reduced flows contribute to the process of endangering and extirpating highly sensitive endemic aquatic biodiversity. Our study reveals that ad hoc or experience-based flow management is no longer tenable to maintain the integrity and functionality of aquatic ecosystems. We stress that quantifying the flow-ecology relationships of foundational species, particularly megafauna, in response to flow variation is crucial for monitoring the effects of water alterations and determining the minimum flows needed for maintaining healthy and functional freshwater ecosystems in the Anthropocene.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHydrobiologyAnimalsDolphinsFishesFood ChainFresh WaterHumansNepalPopulation DynamicsRiversSeasons

Identifiers

PMID33339890
PMCPMC7749117
OpenAlexW3115678621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.