Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Independent control of cocontraction and reciprocal activity during goal-directed reaching in muscle space.

Atsushi Takagi, Hiroyuki Kambara, Yasuharu Koike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atsushi TakagiNTT Communication Science Laboratories, 3-1 Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243-0198, Japan. atsushi.takagi.yx@hco.ntt.co.jp.
Hiroyuki KambaraInstitute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuharu KoikeInstitute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The movement in a joint is facilitated by a pair of muscles that pull in opposite directions. The difference in the pair's muscle force or reciprocal activity results in joint torque, while the overlapping muscle force or the cocontraction is related to the joint's stiffness. Cocontraction knowingly adapts implicitly over a number of movements, but it is unclear whether the central nervous system can actively regulate cocontraction in a goal-directed manner in a short span of time. We developed a muscle interface where a cursor's horizontal position was determined by the reciprocal activity of the shoulder flexion-extension muscle pair, while the vertical position was controlled by its cocontraction. Participants made goal-directed movements to single and via-point targets in the two-dimensional muscle space, learning to move the cursor along the shortest path. Simulations using an optimal control framework suggest that the reciprocal activity and the cocontraction may be controlled independently by the CNS, albeit at a rate orders of magnitude slower than the muscle's maximal activation speed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultArmBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHumansMaleMovementMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeurosciencesShoulderYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33339876
PMCPMC7749118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.