ArticleScientific reports2020
Scaffold-based 3D cellular models mimicking the heterogeneity of osteosarcoma stem cell niche.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unlocking the Potential of Spheroids in Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review of Seeding Methodologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- The Osteosarcoma Tumor Microenvironment: From Cellular Interactions to Advanced Preclinical Models.Cancers · 2026Review
- Phase-Separated Nanoarchitecture of Adhesion-Cytoskeleton Force Coupling Reforms Nuclear Spatiotemporal Posture Conformation and Mechanotransduction of Osteosarcoma on Biofunctional Microarrays.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a Simple 3D Bioengineered Model: A Step Closer to Bridging the In Vitro-In Vivo Gap in Osteosarcoma Research.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Next-generation osteosarcoma models for precision medicine.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Antimicrobial and regenerative copper-doped hybrid biomaterials for bone infection treatment.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Nuclear Mechanotransduction Across the Metastatic Cascade: Decoding Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Cancer Dissemination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- An Intelligent Magneto-Mechanical Platform for Cellular Sensing in 3D Microenvironments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advancement in Scaffold-Based 3D Cell Culture Models for Osteosarcoma Drug Screening.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Scaffolds Mimicking the Tumor Microenvironment for In Vitro Malignancy Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Production of plateletsHaematologica · 2025Article
- Targeting Cell-Matrix Induced Chemoresistance With Regorafenib in a 3D Model of Osteosarcoma.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2025Article
- Molecular and Glycosylation Pathways in Osteosarcoma: Tumor Microenvironment and Emerging Strategies Toward Personalized Oncology.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Exploring bone-tumor interactions through 3DJournal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- A Modular Biomimetic Preclinical Platform to Elucidate the Interaction Between Cancer Cells and the Bone Metastatic Niche.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- 3D-printed β-TCP scaffold as a bone-mimicking environment for an engineered model of osteosarcoma:Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Article
- Advancing cancer research through 3D cell culture models.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The failure of the osteosarcoma conventional therapies leads to the growing need for novel therapeutic strategies. The lack of specificity for the Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) population has been recently identified as the main limitation in the current therapies. Moreover, the traditional two-dimensional (2D) in vitro models, employed in the drug testing and screening as well as in the study of cell and molecular biology, are affected by a poor in vitro-in vivo translation ability. To overcome these limitations, this work provides two tumour engineering approaches as new tools to address osteosarcoma and improve therapy outcomes. In detail, two different hydroxyapatite-based bone-mimicking scaffolds were used to recapitulate aspects of the in vivo tumour microenvironment, focusing on CSCs niche. The biological performance of human osteosarcoma cell lines (MG63 and SAOS-2) and enriched-CSCs were deeply analysed in these complex cell culture models. The results highlight the fundamental role of the tumour microenvironment proving the mimicry of osteosarcoma stem cell niche by the use of CSCs together with the biomimetic scaffolds, compared to conventional 2D culture systems. These advanced 3D cell culture in vitro tumour models could improve the predictivity of preclinical studies and strongly enhance the clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.