ArticleScientific reports2020
Microbial community composition in the rhizosphere of Larix decidua under different light regimes with additional focus on methane cycling microorganisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive in silico analysis of eggNOG-annotated orthologous genes infers functional dynamics and energy metabolism in the microbiome of Abutilon fruticosum.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Generalists and keystone species drive rhizosphere microbial diversity and stability in feral Brassica napus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Postglacial bioweathering, soil nutrient cycling, and podzolization from palaeometagenomics of plants, fungi, and bacteria.Science advances · 2025Article
- Beyond correlation: Understanding the causal link between microbiome and plant health.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Structure and Function of Soil Bacterial Communities in the Different Wetland Types of the Liaohe Estuary Wetland.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Characteristics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of Plant-Microbe Interactions with a Focus on Poorly Investigated Urban Ecosystems-A Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Spatial variations impact the soil fungal communities ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Domestication of Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus) Changes the Microbial Communities in the Rhizosphere.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Beneficial Microorganisms Improve Agricultural Sustainability under Climatic Extremes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Changing Rhizosphere Microbial Community and Metabolites with Developmental Stages ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Sugarcane cultivation practices modulate rhizosphere microbial community composition and structure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Bacterial but Not Fungal Rhizosphere Community Composition Differ among Perennial Grass Ecotypes under Abiotic Environmental Stress.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Genetically related genotypes of cowpea present similar bacterial community in the rhizosphere.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Organic Connection of Holobiont Components and the Essential Roles of Core Microbes in the Holobiont Formation of FeralFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Rhizosphere Microbiome Recruited From Compost Synergistically Determined by Plant Species and Compost.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial community and diversity in the rhizosphere is strongly influenced by biotic and/or abiotic factors, like root exudates, nutrient availability, edaphon and climate. Here we report on the microbial diversity within the rhizosphere of Larix decidua, a dominant tree species in the Alps, as compared with the microbiome within the surrounding soil. We describe how increased light intensity influenced the rhizobiome and put emphasize on methane cycling microorganisms. Microbial taxa were classified into 26 bacterial, 4 archaeal and 6 fungal phyla revealing significant differences between bulk and rhizosphere soils. The dominant prokaryotic phyla were Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria (both, rhizosphere and bulk soil) and Bacteroidetes (rhizosphere soil only) and dominant fungal phyla in both fractions included Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. The rhizosphere community was indicated by Suillus sp., plant growth-promoting bacteria and Candidatus Saccharibacteria. Predicted genes in membrane transport and carbohydrate metabolism were significantly more abundant in rhizosphere soils while genes connected with energy metabolisms and cell motility increased in bulk soils. Dominant methanotrophic microorganisms were Upland Soil Cluster (USC) α methanotrophs, Methylogaea spp. and Methylosinus spp., while most methanogens belonged to Methanomassiliicoccales. The overall abundance of methanotrophs distinctly increased in the rhizosphere but to a very different species-specific extent. The increased light intensity only led to minor changes in the rhizobiome, nevertheless a couple of indicator species (e.g. Pseudomonas sp.) for intensified light conditions were established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.