Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339836›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Application of feed forward and recurrent neural networks in simulation of left ventricular mechanics.

Yaghoub Dabiri, Alex Van der Velden, Kevin L Sack, Jenny S Choy, Julius M Guccione, Ghassan S Kassab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Neural Network Finite Element Trileaflet Heart Valve Model Incorporating Multi-Body Contact.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaghoub Dabiri3DT Holdings LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alex Van der VeldenSIMULIA, Dassault Systemes, Johnston, USA.
Kevin L SackDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jenny S ChoyCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute, 11107 Roselle, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
Julius M GuccioneDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ghassan S KassabCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute, 11107 Roselle, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA. gkassab@calmi2.org.

Funding

Real-Time Virtual Assessment of MitraClip PlacementR43HL145896 · NHLBI · 3DT HOLDINGS, LLC · PI DABIRI, YAGHOUB, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2019 to 2019
$290k
NHLBI NIH HHS R43 HL145896NIH HHS R43 HL145896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An understanding of left ventricle (LV) mechanics is fundamental for designing better preventive, diagnostic, and treatment strategies for improved heart function. Because of the costs of clinical and experimental studies to treat and understand heart function, respectively, in-silico models play an important role. Finite element (FE) models, which have been used to create in-silico LV models for different cardiac health and disease conditions, as well as cardiac device design, are time-consuming and require powerful computational resources, which limits their use when real-time results are needed. As an alternative, we sought to use deep learning (DL) for LV in-silico modeling. We used 80 four-chamber heart FE models for feed forward, as well as recurrent neural network (RNN) with long short-term memory (LSTM) models for LV pressure and volume. We used 120 LV-only FE models for training LV stress predictions. The active material properties of the myocardium and time were features for the LV pressure and volume training, and passive material properties and element centroid coordinates were features of the LV stress prediction models. For six test FE models, the DL error for LV volume was 1.599 ± 1.227 ml, and the error for pressure was 1.257 ± 0.488 mmHg; for 20 LV FE test examples, the mean absolute errors were, respectively, 0.179 ± 0.050 for myofiber, 0.049 ± 0.017 for cross-fiber, and 0.039 ± 0.011 kPa for shear stress. After training, the DL runtime was in the order of seconds whereas equivalent FE runtime was in the order of several hours (pressure and volume) or 20 min (stress). We conclude that using DL, LV in-silico simulations can be provided for applications requiring real-time results.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisHeartHeart VentriclesHumansModels, CardiovascularMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumNeural Networks, ComputerStress, MechanicalVentricular FunctionVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID33339836
PMCPMC7749109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.