Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339462›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2021

Ameliorating the disadvantage for autistic job seekers: An initial evaluation of adapted employment interview questions.

Katie Maras, Jade Eloise Norris, Jemma Nicholson, Brett Heasman, Anna Remington, Laura Crane

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First Impressions Towards Autistic People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reduced Susceptibility to the Dunning-Kruger Effect in Autistic Employees.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Career progression for autistic people: A scoping review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Disclosing an autism diagnosis improves ratings of candidate performance in employment interviews.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Deceptive behaviour in autism: A scoping review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Inclusive Communication Model Supporting the Employment Cycle of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie MarasUniversity of Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-6138
Jade Eloise NorrisUniversity of Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-2692
Jemma NicholsonUniversity of Bath, UK.
Brett HeasmanUniversity College London, UK.
Anna RemingtonUniversity College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4299-8887
Laura CraneUniversity College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4161-3490
University College London · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractDespite possessing valuable skills, differences in the way that autistic people understand and respond to others in social situations mean that they are frequently disadvantaged in job interviews. We examined how autistic and non-autistic adults compared on standard (unmodified) job interview questions, and then used these findings to develop and evaluate supportive adaptations to questions. Fifty adults (25 autistic, 25 non-autistic) took part in two mock job interviews. Interview 1 provided a baseline measure of performance when answering typical, unmodified interview questions. Employment experts (unaware of participants' autism diagnoses) rated all interviewees on their responses to each question and their overall impressions of them and then provided feedback about how interviewees could improve and how questions could be adapted to facilitate this. Interviewees also provided feedback about the interview process, from their perspective. Adaptations to the questions were developed, with Interview 2 taking place approximately 6 months later. Results demonstrated that, in Interview 1, employment experts rated autistic interviewees less favourably than non-autistic interviewees. Ratings of both autistic and non-autistic participants' answers improved in Interview 2, but particularly for autistic interviewees (such that differences between autistic and non-autistic interviewees' performance reduced in Interview 2). Employers should be aware that adaptations to job interview questions are critical to level the playing field for autistic candidates.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAdultAttitudeEmploymentHumansadaptationsautismemploymentimpression managementinterviewingperceptions

Identifiers

PMID33339462
PMCPMC8108109
OpenAlexW3100349529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.