Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339385›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2020

Prediction of Stroke Outcome Using Natural Language Processing-Based Machine Learning of Radiology Report of Brain MRI.

Tak Sung Heo, Yu Seop Kim, Jeong Myeong Choi, Yeong Seok Jeong, Soo Young Seo, Jun Ho Lee, Jin Pyeong Jeon, Chulho Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  14. Natural Language Processing Methods to Identify Oncology Patients at High Risk for Acute Care with Clinical Notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tak Sung HeoDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Yu Seop KimDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Jeong Myeong ChoiDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Yeong Seok JeongDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Soo Young SeoDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.
Jun Ho LeeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.
Jin Pyeong JeonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-6855
Chulho KimDepartment of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8762-8340

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1G1A1097707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for predicting the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although deep learning (DL) using brain MRI with certain image biomarkers has shown satisfactory results in predicting poor outcomes, no study has assessed the usefulness of natural language processing (NLP)-based machine learning (ML) algorithms using brain MRI free-text reports of AIS patients. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether NLP-based ML algorithms using brain MRI text reports could predict poor outcomes in AIS patients. This study included only English text reports of brain MRIs examined during admission of AIS patients. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6, and the data were captured by trained nurses and physicians. We only included MRI text report of the first MRI scan during the admission. The text dataset was randomly divided into a training and test dataset with a 7:3 ratio. Text was vectorized to word, sentence, and document levels. In the word level approach, which did not consider the sequence of words, and the "bag-of-words" model was used to reflect the number of repetitions of text token. The "sent2vec" method was used in the sensation-level approach considering the sequence of words, and the word embedding was used in the document level approach. In addition to conventional ML algorithms, DL algorithms such as the convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory, and multilayer perceptron were used to predict poor outcomes using 5-fold cross-validation and grid search techniques. The performance of each ML classifier was compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Among 1840 subjects with AIS, 645 patients (35.1%) had a poor outcome 3 months after the stroke onset. Random forest was the best classifier (0.782 of AUROC) using a word-level approach. Overall, the document-level approach exhibited better performance than did the word- or sentence-level approaches. Among all the ML classifiers, the multi-CNN algorithm demonstrated the best classification performance (0.805), followed by the CNN (0.799) algorithm. When predicting future clinical outcomes using NLP-based ML of radiology free-text reports of brain MRI, DL algorithms showed superior performance over the other ML algorithms. In particular, the prediction of poor outcomes in document-level NLP DL was improved more by multi-CNN and CNN than by recurrent neural network-based algorithms. NLP-based DL algorithms can be used as an important digital marker for unstructured electronic health record data DL prediction.

Indexed as

deep learningfunctional outcomeischemic strokemachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID33339385
PMCPMC7766032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.