Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339274›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Antonio Facciorusso, Mohamed A Abd El Aziz, Nicola Tartaglia, Daryl Ramai, Babu P Mohan, Christian Cotsoglou, Sara Pusceddu, Luca Giacomelli, Antonio Ambrosi, Rodolfo Sacco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06096896 (The Efficacy and Safety of EOB-MRI Guided Microwave Ablation for Early HCC), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06096896 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy and Safety of EOB-MRI Guided Microwave Ablation for Early HCC: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorShandong Provincial HospitalRan2023 to 2030Enrolled334ConditionsEarly Hepatocellular CarcinomaArmsMWA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tissue Ablation: Applications and Perspectives.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Guidelines for image-guided ablation of primary liver cancer (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonio FacciorussoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-2156
Mohamed A Abd El AzizDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4477-0114
Nicola TartagliaDepartment of Medical Sciences, General Surgery Unit, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-7080
Daryl RamaiGastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooklyn Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.
Babu P MohanGastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Christian CotsoglouGeneral Surgery Department, ASST-Vimercate, 20871 Vimercate, Italy.
Sara PuscedduFondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Via G. Venezian 1 IT, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Luca GiacomelliDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16126 Genoa, Italy.
Antonio AmbrosiDepartment of Medical Sciences, General Surgery Unit, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Rodolfo SaccoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9887-7315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are limited and discordant results on the comparison between microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This meta-analysis aims to compare the two treatments in terms of efficacy and safety, based on a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). A computerized bibliographic search was performed on the main databases throughout August 2020. The primary outcome was the complete response rate, while survival rate (at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year), disease-free survival rate (at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year), local and distant recurrence rate, adverse event rate, and number of treatment sessions were the secondary outcomes. Seven RCTs enrolling 921 patients were included. No difference in terms of complete response between the two treatments was observed (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.02). Survival rates were constantly similar, with RRs ranging from 1.05 (0.96-1.15) at 1 year to 0.91 (0.81-1.03) at 5 years. While local recurrence rate was similar between MWA and RFA (RR 0.70, 0.43-1.14), distant recurrence rate was significantly lower with MWA (RR 0.60, 0.39-0.92). Disease-free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was similar between the two groups with RR 1.00 (0.96-1.04), 0.94 (0.84-1.06), and 1.06 (0.93-1.21), respectively. On the other hand, RR for disease-free survival at 5 years was significantly in favor of MWA (3.66, 1.32-42.27). Adverse event rate was similar between the two treatments (RR 1.06, 0.48-2.34), with bleeding and hematoma representing the most frequent complications. Our results indicate a similar efficacy and safety profile between the two techniques. MWA seems to decrease the rate of long-term recurrences, but this finding needs to be confirmed in further trials.

Indexed as

HCCliver cancerMWArecurrenceRFAsurvival

Identifiers

PMID33339274
PMCPMC7766963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.