ReviewCancers2020
Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Different Clinical Scenarios of Breast Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of serum tumor markers in assessing the efficacy of TP (Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin) chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab dual target therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Expert recommendations for PIK3CA testing in HR+/HER2- locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA in HR+/HER2- Stage I-III Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA for surveillance in high-risk melanoma patients: a study protocol.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Cell-free DNA testing for early hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Electrochemical Nano Biosensors for Precise Detection of Blood-Based Oncomarkers in Breast Cancer.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Clearance of ctDNA in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant treatment is correlated with pathologic complete response.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Profile, treatment patterns, and influencing factors of anthracycline use in breast cancer patients in China: A nation-wide multicenter study.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a complex disease whose molecular mechanisms are not completely understood. Developing target therapies is a promising approach. Therefore, understanding the biological behavior of the tumor is a challenge. Tissue biopsy in the metastatic setting remains the standard method for diagnosis. Nevertheless, it has been associated with some disadvantages: It is an invasive procedure, it may not represent tumor heterogeneity, and it does not allow for treatment efficacy to be assessed or early recurrences to be detected. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help to overcome this as it is a non-invasive method of monitoring the disease. In early-stage disease, it can detect early recurrences and monitor tumors' genomic profiles, identifying the emergence of new genetic alterations which can be related to tumor-acquired resistance. In the metastatic setting, the analysis of ctDNA may also allow for the anticipation of clinical and radiological progression of the disease, selection of targeted therapies, and for a photogram of tumor heterogeneity to be provided. It may also detect disease progression earlier in locally advanced tumors submitted to neoadjuvant treatment, and identify minimal residual disease. ctDNA analysis may guide clinical decision-making in different scenarios, in a precision medicine era, once it acts as a repository of genetic tumor material, allowing for a comprehensive mutation profiling analysis. In this review, we focused on recent advances towards the implementation of ctDNA in a clinical routine for breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.