ArticleCancers2020
The Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumour DNA in Melanoma Patients Treated with Systemic Therapies-Beyond
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in circulating tumor DNA and outcomes in solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Melanoma Prognosis and Therapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Development of a Nomogram to Predict Therapeutic Resistance in Metastatic Melanoma Using Longitudinal ctDNA Kinetics.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Melanoma: Advances in Detection, Clinical Applications, and Integration with Emerging Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular Basis of BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA monitoring in advanced mutated melanoma (LIQUID-MEL).The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Article
- Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Current Techniques and Potential Applications in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Investigating the frequency of somatic MYD88 L265P mutation in primary ocular adnexal B cell lymphoma.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- A multiparameter liquid biopsy approach allows to track melanoma dynamics and identify early treatment resistance.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Harnessing ctDNA in Advanced Melanoma: A Promising Tool for Informed Clinical Decisions.Cancers · 2024Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA Is a Variant of Liquid Biopsy with Predictive and Prognostic Clinical Value in Breast Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Progresses in biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy.MedComm · 2023Review
- [Lymphoma of the eye and its adnexa : Modern pathological diagnostics and systemic treatment].Die Ophthalmologie · 2022Review
- Circulating Tumour DNA in Melanoma-Clinic Ready?Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Anchored Multiplex PCR Custom Melanoma Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Review
- Identification of a Gene Prognostic Model of Gastric Cancer Based on Analysis of Tumor Mutation Burden.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to inform therapeutic outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving systemic therapies. We analysed 142 plasma samples from metastatic melanoma patients prior to commencement of systemic therapy: 70 were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and 72 with immunotherapies. Patient-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assays were designed for ctDNA detection. Plasma ctDNA was detected in 56% of patients prior to first-line anti-PD1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 treatment. The detection rate in the immunotherapy cohort was comparably lower than those with BRAF inhibitors (76%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.