Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33339132›Full record

ArticleDentistry journal2020

Extrusive Luxation Injuries in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study with 5-Year Follow-Up.

Enrico Spinas, Laura Pipi, Claudia Dettori

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05305586 (Comparison of Bulk-fill Flowable and Packable Composite in Splinting of Luxation Injuries), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05305586 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Bulk-fill Flowable and Packable Composite in Splinting of Luxation Injuries: A Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDow University of Health SciencesRan2019 to 2020Enrolled88ConditionsDental Trauma, SplintsArmsSplint retained by Bulk-fill flowable, Splint retained by Packable Composite
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enrico SpinasDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sports Dental Research Center, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale, 40-09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4563-9804
Laura PipiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sports Dental Research Center, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale, 40-09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-4771
Claudia DettoriDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale, 40-09124 Cagliari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of the chosen diagnostic and therapeutic approach (repositioning and splinting methods) on the risk, frequency and timing of the onset of pulp canal obliteration and pulp necrosis following extrusive luxation in young patients with permanent dentition. (2) Methods: From an initial sample of 50 subjects affected by extrusive luxation, were selected the clinical data of 13 patients presenting extrusive luxation but no other type of injury to the dental hard tissue. All teeth were examined according to a standardized protocol. Follow-up examinations were performed at regular intervals for 5 years. Statistical associations between pulp consequences and several covariates were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test. (3) Results: Among the 13 studied teeth, only 1 healed completely, whereas 9 showed pulp obliteration and 3 developed pulp necrosis. No tooth with obliteration developed pulp necrosis. The average time to treatment was 11.9 h. The treatment approaches used were manual repositioning, orthodontic repositioning and stabilization splinting. "Time to treatment" was the only covariate that showed a weak statistical association with the onset of pulp consequences. (4) Conclusions: There is still uncertainty over the most appropriate therapeutic approach to adopt in young patients with extrusive luxation injuries, particularly for repositioning of the injured tooth. Extruded teeth should be treated as soon as possible after the traumatic event. This study highlighted the value of orthodontic repositioning of the extruded tooth, which does not seem to aggravate the conditions of the dental pulp. In addition, the study confirmed that prophylactic endodontic treatment is not appropriate for immature teeth affected by extrusive luxation injuries, given the extreme rarity of pulp necrosis in teeth already affected by pulp obliteration.

Indexed as

dental traumaextrusionpermanent toothpulp canal obliterationpulp necrosis

Identifiers

PMID33339132
PMCPMC7765625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.