Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338986›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Effects of ACT Out! Social Issue Theater on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jon Agley, Mikyoung Jun, Lori Eldridge, Daniel L Agley, Yunyu Xiao, Steve Sussman, Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo, Stephanie L Dickinson, Wasantha Jayawardene, Ruth Gassman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04097496 (Multi-Site Cluster, Randomized Proof of Concept Trial to Study the Effects of the ACT OUT! Social Issue Theater Program on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04097496 naterminatednot on this map

Multi-Site Cluster, Randomized Proof of Concept Trial to Study the Effects of the ACT OUT! Social Issue Theater Program on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled1,537ConditionsSocial Competence, BullyingArmsAct Out! Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Family and Educational Strategies for Cyberbullying Prevention: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jon AgleyPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8850
Mikyoung JunPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-5306
Lori EldridgePrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-1091
Daniel L AgleyPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-8729
Yunyu XiaoSchool of Social Work, Indiana University Bloomington and Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0479-1781
Steve SussmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-9718
Lilian Golzarri-ArroyoBiostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1221-6701
Stephanie L DickinsonBiostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2998-4467
Wasantha JayawardenePrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-0894
Ruth GassmanPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-7320
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools increasingly prioritize social-emotional competence and bullying and cyberbullying prevention, so the development of novel, low-cost, and high-yield programs addressing these topics is important. Further, rigorous assessment of interventions prior to widespread dissemination is crucial.

objectiveThis study assesses the effectiveness and implementation fidelity of the ACT Out! Social Issue Theater program, a 1-hour psychodramatic intervention by professional actors; it also measures students' receptiveness to the intervention.

methodsThis study is a 2-arm cluster randomized control trial with 1:1 allocation that randomized either to the ACT Out! intervention or control (treatment as usual) at the classroom level (n=76 classrooms in 12 schools across 5 counties in Indiana, comprised of 1571 students at pretest in fourth, seventh, and tenth grades). The primary outcomes were self-reported social-emotional competence, bullying perpetration, and bullying victimization; the secondary outcomes were receptiveness to the intervention, implementation fidelity (independent observer observation), and prespecified subanalyses of social-emotional competence for seventh- and tenth-grade students. All outcomes were collected at baseline and 2-week posttest, with planned 3-months posttest data collection prevented due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsIntervention fidelity was uniformly excellent (>96% adherence), and students were highly receptive to the program. However, trial results did not support the hypothesis that the intervention would increase participants' social-emotional competence. The intervention's impact on bullying was complicated to interpret and included some evidence of small interaction effects (reduced cyberbullying victimization and increased physical bullying perpetration). Additionally, pooled within-group reductions were also observed and discussed but were not appropriate for causal attribution.

conclusionsThis study found no superiority for a 1-hour ACT Out! intervention compared to treatment as usual for social-emotional competence or offline bullying, but some evidence of a small effect for cyberbullying. On the basis of these results and the within-group effects, as a next step, we encourage research into whether the ACT Out! intervention may engender a bystander effect not amenable to randomization by classroom. Therefore, we recommend a larger trial of the ACT Out! intervention that focuses specifically on cyberbullying, measures bystander behavior, is randomized by school, and is controlled for extant bullying prevention efforts at each school.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04097496; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04097496. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/17900.

Indexed as

adolescentsassessmentbullybullyingchildrencyberbullyingeffectivenessemotionfidelityimplementationinterventionoutcomepreventionrandomized controlled trialRCTreceptionschoolSELsocial-emotional competencesocial-emotional learningyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID33338986
PMCPMC7817353
OpenAlexW3117505882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.