Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338931›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials2021

Biomaterials to enhance antigen-specific T cell expansion for cancer immunotherapy.

Ariel Isser, Natalie K Livingston, Jonathan P Schneck

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antigen-conjugated scaffolds enable sustained delivery of antigen and enrichment of antigen-specific T-cells.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Theranostics · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariel IsserDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, USA; Institute for Cell Engineering, School of Medicine, USA.
Natalie K LivingstonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, USA; Institute for Cell Engineering, School of Medicine, USA; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, USA; Institute for Nanobiotechnology, USA.
Jonathan P SchneckInstitute for Cell Engineering, School of Medicine, USA; Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, USA; Institute for Nanobiotechnology, USA; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jschnec1@jhmi.edu.
Institute of Cell Biology · UAJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TR&D Project 3P41EB028239 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jordan Green, JONATHAN P SCHNECK · 2019 to 2026
$11.5M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Biomimetic Matrix for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Activation of T CellsR01EB029341 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, HAI-QUAN, SCHNECK, JONATHAN P · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
A high-throughput nanoparticle assay to characterize cancer neoepitope-specific T cellsR33CA229042 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNECK, JONATHAN P · 2019 to 2021
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA229042NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028239NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029341NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells are often referred to as the 'guided missiles' of our immune system because of their capacity to traffic to and accumulate at sites of infection or disease, destroy infected or mutated cells with high specificity and sensitivity, initiate systemic immune responses, sterilize infections, and produce long-lasting memory. As a result, they are a common target for a range of cancer immunotherapies. However, the myriad of challenges of expanding large numbers of T cells specific to each patient's unique tumor antigens has led researchers to develop alternative, more scalable approaches. Biomaterial platforms for expansion of antigen-specific T cells offer a path forward towards broadscale translation of personalized immunotherapies by providing "off-the-shelf", yet modular approaches to customize the phenotype, function, and specificity of T cell responses. In this review, we discuss design considerations and progress made in the development of ex vivo and in vivo technologies for activating antigen-specific T cells, including artificial antigen presenting cells, T cell stimulating scaffolds, biomaterials-based vaccines, and artificial lymphoid organs. Ultimate translation of these platforms as a part of cancer immunotherapy regimens hinges on an in-depth understanding of T cell biology and cell-material interactions.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsNeoplasmsAntigen-Presenting CellsHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesBiocompatible MaterialsArtificial antigen-presenting cellsCancer immunotherapyImmunoengineeringParticlesScaffoldsT cell

Identifiers

PMID33338931
PMCPMC7856270
OpenAlexW3111033427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.