Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338870›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2021

Gaussianization of Diffusion MRI Data Using Spatially Adaptive Filtering.

Feihong Liu, Jun Feng, Geng Chen, Dinggang Shen, Pew-Thian Yap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [A diffusion-weighted image denoising algorithm using HOSVD combined with Rician noise corrected model].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feihong LiuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, China; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center (BRIC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.
Jun FengSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, China; State-Province Joint Engineering and Research Center of Advanced Networking and Intelligent Information Services, School of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, China. Electronic address: fengjun@nwu.edu.cn.
Geng ChenDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center (BRIC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.. Electronic address: geng.chen.cs@gmail.com.
Dinggang ShenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: dgshen@med.unc.edu.
Pew-Thian YapDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center (BRIC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.. Electronic address: ptyap@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Development of Robust Brain Measurement Tools Informed by Ultrahigh Field 7T MRIR01EB006733 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2008 to 2020
$4.5M
Robust White Matter Morphometry with Small DatabasesR01NS093842 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006733NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI magnitude data, typically Rician or noncentral χ distributed, is affected by the noise floor, which falsely elevates signal, reduces image contrast, and biases estimation of diffusion parameters. Noise floor can be avoided by extracting real-valued Gaussian-distributed data from complex diffusion-weighted images via phase correction, which is performed by rotating each complex diffusion-weighted image based on its phase so that the actual image content resides in the real part. The imaginary part can then be discarded, leaving only the real part to form a Gaussian-noise image that is not confounded by the noise floor. The effectiveness of phase correction depends on the estimation of the background phase associated with factors such as brain motion, cardiac pulsation, perfusion, and respiration. Most existing smoothing techniques, applied to the real and imaginary images for phase estimation, assume spatially-stationary noise. This assumption does not necessarily hold in real data. In this paper, we introduce an adaptive filtering approach, called multi-kernel filter (MKF), for image smoothing catering to spatially-varying noise. Inspired by the mechanisms of human vision, MKF employs a bilateral filter with spatially-varying kernels. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MKF significantly improves spatial adaptivity and outperforms various state-of-the-art filters in signal Gaussianization.

Indexed as

ArtifactsImage EnhancementAlgorithmsBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansadaptive smoothingedge-preserving filternonstationary noisePhase correction

Identifiers

PMID33338870
PMCPMC7855815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.