ArticleJournal of biomechanics2021
Assessment of turning performance and muscle coordination in individuals post-stroke.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Task-Based Mapping of Compensatory Strategies and Movement Kinematics After Stroke: A Systematic Scoping Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Barriers and strategies affecting the use of assistive devices for falls prevention among people with Parkinson's disease: a qualitative pilot study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Cautious Gait during Navigational Tasks in People with Hemiparesis: An Observational Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Observational
- Smoothness of movement in idiopathic cervical dystonia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Basic Spatiotemporal Gait Variables of Young and Older Healthy Volunteers Walking Along a Novel Figure-of-8 Path.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Turning is an important activity of daily living and often compromised post-stroke. The fall rate for individuals post-stroke while turning is nearly four times as high compared to healthy adults, with most falls resulting in injury. Thus, there is a need for evidence-based rehabilitation targets to improve turning performance for individuals post-stroke. To produce well-coordinated movements, muscles can be organized into muscle modules (i.e., groups of co-excited muscles). Post-stroke these modules can be merged, leading to impaired muscle coordination and walking performance. However, the relationship between impaired coordination and turning performance is not well understood. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of impaired muscle coordination (i.e., merged modules) on turning performance (i.e., time and number of steps required to complete a turn, and smoothness and balance control during the turn). Individuals post-stroke and healthy controls performed three tasks including overground straight-line walking, a 90-degree turn, and a 180-degree turn. The number of muscle modules during straight-line walking were determined using non-negative matrix factorization. During 180-degree turning, those with two modules took longer to turn, used more steps and had less smooth movement. Those with reduced module complexity exhibited diminished balance control during both 90-degree and 180-degree turning. These results suggest obtaining independent modules should be an important aim in locomotor therapies aimed at improving turning performance. In addition, the time it takes to complete a 180-degree turn may provide useful clinical insight into impaired muscle coordination post-stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.