Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338604›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V2021

Evolution of drug-eluting biomedical implants for sustained drug delivery.

Juliana C Quarterman, Sean M Geary, Aliasger K Salem

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biopolymeric Coatings for Local Release of Therapeutics from Biomedical Implants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana C QuartermanUniversity of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, 180 S. Grand Avenue, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Sean M GearyUniversity of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, 180 S. Grand Avenue, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Aliasger K SalemUniversity of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, 180 S. Grand Avenue, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: aliasger-salem@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jong Sung Kim · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of drug delivery, the most commonly used treatments have traditionally been systemically delivered using oral or intravenous administration. The problems associated with this type of delivery is that the drug concentration is controlled by first pass metabolism, and therefore may not always remain within the therapeutic window. Implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs) are an excellent alternative to traditional delivery because they offer the ability to precisely control the drug release, deliver drugs locally to the target tissue, and avoid the toxic side effects often experienced with systemic administration. Since the creation of the first FDA-approved IDDS in 1990, there has been a surge in research devoted to fabricating and testing novel IDDS formulations. The versatility of these systems is evident when looking at the various biomedical applications that utilize IDDSs. This review provides an overview of the history of IDDSs, with examples of the different types of IDDS formulations, as well as looking at current and future biomedical applications for such systems. Though there are still obstacles that need to be overcome, ever-emerging new technologies are making the manufacturing of IDDSs a rewarding therapeutic endeavor with potential for further improvements.

Indexed as

Delayed-Action PreparationsDrug ApprovalDrug CompoundingDrug-Eluting StentsDrug ImplantsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsBiomedical implant applicationsBiomedical implantsControlled drug releaseDrug deliveryDrug eluting biomaterialsDrug-eluting biomedical implantSustained drug release

Identifiers

PMID33338604
PMCPMC7856224
OpenAlexW3111367599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.