Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338231›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

A comparison of general and disease-specific machine learning models for the prediction of unplanned hospital readmissions.

Thomas Sutter, Jan A Roth, Kieran Chin-Cheong, Balthasar L Hug, Julia E Vogt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas SutterMedical Data Science, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan A RothUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Kieran Chin-CheongMedical Data Science, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Balthasar L HugUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Julia E VogtMedical Data Science, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unplanned hospital readmissions are a burden to patients and increase healthcare costs. A wide variety of machine learning (ML) models have been suggested to predict unplanned hospital readmissions. These ML models were often specifically trained on patient populations with certain diseases. However, it is unclear whether these specialized ML models-trained on patient subpopulations with certain diseases or defined by other clinical characteristics-are more accurate than a general ML model trained on an unrestricted hospital cohort. In this study based on an electronic health record cohort of consecutive inpatient cases of a single tertiary care center, we demonstrate that accurate prediction of hospital readmissions may be obtained by general, disease-independent, ML models. This general approach may substantially decrease the cost of development and deployment of respective ML models in daily clinical routine, as all predictions are obtained by the use of a single model.

Indexed as

HospitalizationMachine LearningModels, StatisticalPatient ReadmissionArea Under CurveCardiovascular DiseasesChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLung DiseasesMaleNeoplasmsPrognosisDigital epidemiologydisease-specific modelhospital readmissionmachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID33338231
PMCPMC7973448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.