Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338051›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Sex differences in chronic kidney disease awareness among US adults, 1999 to 2018.

Sebastian Hödlmoser, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Jarcy Zee, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Ronald L Pisoni, Friedrich K Port, Bruce M Robinson, Robin Ristl, Simon Krenn, Amelie Kurnikowski and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Kidney replacement therapy for men and women according to the ERA Registry and the USRDS.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex-Associated Biomarker Differences in CKD Progression and Mortality.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sebastian HödlmoserDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSelzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Jarcy ZeeArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Ronald L PisoniArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Friedrich K PortArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Bruce M RobinsonArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Robin RistlCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Simon KrennDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0899-9085
Amelie KurnikowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michał LewandowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5612-3603
Allison TonDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Juan Jesus CarreroDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva S SchernhammerDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4337-9415
Manfred HeckingDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8047-2395

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is less prevalent among men than women, but more men than women initiate kidney replacement therapy. Differences in CKD awareness may contribute to this gender gap, which may further vary by race/ethnicity. We aimed to investigate trends in CKD awareness and the association between individual characteristics and CKD awareness among US men versus women. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis of 10 cycles (1999-2018) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Adult participants with CKD stages G3-G5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73m2) were included, unless they were on dialysis or medical information was missing. Serum creatinine was measured during NHANES medical exams. CKD stage was classified by eGFR, based on the CKD-EPI formula. CKD awareness was assessed with the question: "Have you ever been told by a health care professional you had weak or failing kidneys", asked in standardized NHANES questionnaires on each survey. Using logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between sex and CKD awareness, adjusting for potential confounders including age, race/ethnicity and comorbidities. We stratified CKD awareness by 5 pre-defined calendar-year periods and conducted all analyses for the complete study population as well as the Caucasian and African American subpopulations. We found that among 101871 US persons participating in NHANES, 4411 (2232 women) had CKD in stages G3-G5. These participants were, on average, 73±10 years old, 25.3% reported diabetes, 78.0% reported hypertension or had elevated blood pressure during medical examinations and 39.8% were obese (percentages were survey-weighted). CKD awareness was more prevalent among those with higher CKD stage, younger age, diabetes, hypertension and higher body mass index. CKD awareness was generally low (<22.5%), though it increased throughout the study period, remaining consistently higher among men compared to women, with a decreasing gender gap over time (adjusted odds ratio [men-to-women] for CKD awareness = 2.71 [1.31-5.64] in period 1; = 1.32 [0.82-2.12] in period 5). The sex difference in CKD awareness was smaller in African American participants, in whom CKD awareness was generally higher. Using serum creatinine rather than eGFR as the CKD-defining exposure, CKD awareness increased with rising serum creatinine, in a close to identical fashion among both sexes during 1999-2008, while during 2009-2018, CKD awareness among women increased earlier than among men (i.e. with lower serum creatinine levels).

conclusionsCKD awareness is lower among US women than men. The narrowing gap between the sexes in more recent years and the results on CKD awareness by serum creatinine indicate that health care professionals have previously been relying on serum creatinine to inform patients about their condition, but in more recent years have been using eGFR, which accounts for women's lower serum creatinine levels due to their lower muscle mass. Additional efforts should be made to increase CKD awareness among both sexes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBody Mass IndexComorbidityCreatinineDiabetes MellitusFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHypertensionKidneyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID33338051
PMCPMC7748269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.