Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33338032›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Ten simple rules for creating a brand-new virtual academic meeting (even amid a pandemic).

Scott Rich, Andreea O Diaconescu, John D Griffiths, Milad Lankarany

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott RichDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-742X
Andreea O DiaconescuKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3633-9757
John D GriffithsKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1764-2179
Milad LankaranyDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6571-2867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased democratization of the creation, implementation, and attendance of academic conferences has been a serendipitous benefit of the movement toward virtual meetings. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the transition to online conferences and, in parallel, their democratization, by necessity. This manifests not just in the mitigation of barriers to attending traditional physical conferences but also in the presentation of new, and more importantly attainable, opportunities for young scientists to carve out a niche in the landscape of academic meetings. Here, we describe an early "proof of principle" of this democratizing power via our experience organizing the Canadian Computational Neuroscience Spotlight (CCNS; crowdcast.io/e/CCNS), a free 2-day virtual meeting that was built entirely amid the pandemic using only virtual tools. While our experience was unique considering the obstacles faced in creating a conference during a pandemic, this was not the only factor differentiating both our experience and the resulting meeting from other contemporary online conferences. Specifically, CCNS was crafted entirely by early career researchers (ECRs) without any sponsors or partners, advertised primarily using social media and "word of mouth," and designed specifically to highlight and engage trainees. From this experience, we have distilled "10 simple rules" as a blueprint for the design of new virtual academic meetings, especially in the absence of institutional support or partnerships, in this unprecedented environment. By highlighting the lessons learned in implementing our meeting under these arduous circumstances, we hope to encourage other young scientists to embrace this challenge, which would serve as a critical next step in further democratizing academic meetings.

Indexed as

Social MediaTelecommunicationsBrainCanadaComputational BiologyCongresses as TopicCOVID-19HumansInternational CooperationInternetNeurosciencesOscillometryPandemicsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID33338032
PMCPMC7748144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.