Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33337592›Full record

Trial reportPsychosomatic medicine

The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge.

Richard P Sloan, Peter A Shapiro, Vincenzo Lauriola, Kathleen McIntyre, Martina Pavlicova, Chien-Wen Jean Choi, Tse-Hwei Choo, Jennifer M Scodes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychosomatic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01335737 (Exercise and Inflammation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01335737 nacompletednot on this map

Exercise and Inflammation: Autonomic, Affective & Cellular Mechanisms

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York State Psychiatric InstituteRan2010 to 2015Enrolled241ConditionsCardiovascular DiseaseArmsaerobic training, Wait list
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard P SloanFrom the Division of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry (Sloan, Lauriola, McIntyre), Division of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry (Shapiro), Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health (Pavlicova), Columbia University Irving Medical Center; and Division of Mental Health Data Science (Choi, Choo, Scodes) and Behavioral and Psychosomatic Medicine, New York State Psychiatric Institute (Sloan), New York, New York.
Peter A Shapiro
Vincenzo Lauriola
Kathleen McIntyre
Martina Pavlicova
Chien-Wen Jean Choi
Tse-Hwei Choo
Jennifer M Scodes

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Exercise and Inflammation: Autonomic, Affective & Cellular MechanismsR01HL094423 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SLOAN, RICHARD P · 2009 to 2013
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElevated cardiovascular reactivity to, and reduced recovery from, challenging events may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and exercise training may reduce this reactivity. However, in a randomized controlled trial of aerobic versus strength training in sedentary, healthy young adults, we found no training group differences in reactivity or recovery. Because strength training also may have a reactivity-reducing effect, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from another trial, this time with a wait-list control condition.

methodsOne hundred nineteen healthy, young, sedentary adults were randomized to a 12-week aerobic training program or wait-list control. Before (T1) and after (T2) training and after 4 weeks of sedentary deconditioning (T3), we measured heart rate (HR), heart rate variability, and blood pressure at rest and in response to and recovery from psychological and orthostatic challenge. Data were analyzed using a group (aerobic versus wait-list) by session (T1, T2, and deconditioning) and by period (baseline, psychological challenge, recovery, standing) three-way analysis of variance with prespecified contrasts.

resultsAerobic capacity significantly increased at T2 and decreased at T3 only in the aerobic training group. The groups did not differ on HR, heart rate variability, or blood pressure reactivity to or recovery from challenge. Without baseline adjustment, there were no significant treatment differences in response to challenges. With baseline adjustment, there were significant treatment by session effects for HR (Cohen d = 0.54, p = .002), systolic blood pressure (d = 0.44, p = .014), diastolic blood pressure (d = 0.74, p = .002), and root mean squared successive difference (d = 0.48, p = .006) reactivity from T1 to T2 only for orthostatic challenge: at T2, reactivity in the aerobic group was nonsignificantly reduced, compared with T1. In the wait-list group, reactivity significantly increased after T1.

conclusionsThis study raises further doubt about attenuation of cardiovascular reactivity or enhancement of recovery as a cardioprotective mechanism of aerobic exercise training.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01335737.

Indexed as

ExerciseResistance TrainingBlood PressureExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33337592
PMCPMC7858227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.