Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33337525›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2021

[Back pain in the primary care setting : Non-specific back pain].

D Burchert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. MMW Fortschritte der Medizin · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D BurchertDiabetologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Römerstraße 14, 55129, Mainz, Deutschland. burchert-mainz@t-online.de.
Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic survey of the symptoms of back pain in terms of the triggering event and onset, nature of the pain and the extent to which pain dynamics can be influenced (lying or standing, under stress, nocturnal pain, localized percussion tenderness, B symptoms, etc.), as well as a structured clinical examination (segment height, radiance, projection, reflex status, sensitivity, and motor function), allows an initial and therefore orienting classification of back pain as non-specific or specific. Thus, in the primary care setting, many patients can be treated extremely effectively and economically from a cost perspective. The more precise the initial findings are, the more effective the measures taken are in general. In addition to the fastest possible pain relief, it is important to prevent the disease taking an unfavorable course and to avoid chronicity. In addition to non-pharmacological measures (initial rest and starting home exercises early on, promoting everyday mobility, physiotherapy, manual therapy, etc.), a wide range of pharmacological treatment alternatives is available. In the further course of treatment, it may be necessary to consult medical specialists in the fields of radiology, orthopedics, neurology, neurosurgery, rheumatology, psychotherapy, and psychiatry, among others. Treatment is managed by the primary care provider, who should also receive and re-evaluate all findings during the course of the disease.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyBack PainHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrimary Health CareChronic painLow back painMultimodal treatmentNon-specific back pain/non-pharmacological therapyNon-specific back pain/pharmacological therapy

Identifiers

PMID33337525
OpenAlexW3112268152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.