ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Technical Aspects of Developing Chatbots for Medical Applications: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness and Acceptability of Conversational Agents for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Healthcare Artificial Intelligent Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Enhancing patient care with AI agents: integrating advanced chatbot technologies for improved healthcare delivery.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
- The Development and Use of AI Chatbots for Health Behavior Change: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Recent applications of artificial intelligence in cancer radiotherapy and immunotherapy: current status and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Generative AI Chatbot for Diabetes Management: Formative 2-Part Qualitative Study Using DTalksBot Involving Patients and Clinicians.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Can ChatGPT be trusted? Evaluating AI responses to oral health questions among pregnant Arabic-speaking women.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in dental education: can AI-based chatbots compete with general practitioners?BMC medical education · 2025Article
- GPT-4 as a source of patient information for cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis against Google web search.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- Article
- Current Applications of Chatbots Powered by Large Language Models in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Evaluating the evidence-based potential of six large language models in paediatric dentistry: a comparative study on generative artificial intelligence.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Article
- Challenges and applications of artificial intelligence in infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- GPT-4 as a Source of Patient Information for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search.Global spine journal · 2024Review
- Roles, Users, Benefits, and Limitations of Chatbots in Health Care: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- BERT-Based Medical Chatbot: Enhancing Healthcare Communication through Natural Language Understanding.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- "That's just Future Medicine" - a qualitative study on users' experiences of symptom checker apps.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- An artificial neural network approach for the language learning model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- An Integrative Survey on Mental Health Conversational Agents to Bridge Computer Science and Medical Perspectives.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChatbots are applications that can conduct natural language conversations with users. In the medical field, chatbots have been developed and used to serve different purposes. They provide patients with timely information that can be critical in some scenarios, such as access to mental health resources. Since the development of the first chatbot, ELIZA, in the late 1960s, much effort has followed to produce chatbots for various health purposes developed in different ways.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the technical aspects and development methodologies associated with chatbots used in the medical field to explain the best methods of development and support chatbot development researchers on their future work.
methodsWe searched for relevant articles in 8 literature databases (IEEE, ACM, Springer, ScienceDirect, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar). We also performed forward and backward reference checking of the selected articles. Study selection was performed by one reviewer, and 50% of the selected studies were randomly checked by a second reviewer. A narrative approach was used for result synthesis. Chatbots were classified based on the different technical aspects of their development. The main chatbot components were identified in addition to the different techniques for implementing each module.
resultsThe original search returned 2481 publications, of which we identified 45 studies that matched our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common language of communication between users and chatbots was English (n=23). We identified 4 main modules: text understanding module, dialog management module, database layer, and text generation module. The most common technique for developing text understanding and dialogue management is the pattern matching method (n=18 and n=25, respectively). The most common text generation is fixed output (n=36). Very few studies relied on generating original output. Most studies kept a medical knowledge base to be used by the chatbot for different purposes throughout the conversations. A few studies kept conversation scripts and collected user data and previous conversations.
conclusionsMany chatbots have been developed for medical use, at an increasing rate. There is a recent, apparent shift in adopting machine learning-based approaches for developing chatbot systems. Further research can be conducted to link clinical outcomes to different chatbot development techniques and technical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.