Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336451›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Spatial process decomposition for quantitative imaging biomarkers using multiple images of varying shapes.

ShengLi Tzeng, Jun Zhu, Amy J Weisman, Tyler J Bradshaw, Robert Jeraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

ShengLi TzengDepartment of Applied Mathematics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3879-9420
Jun ZhuDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Amy J WeismanDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Tyler J BradshawDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Robert JerajDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Dose painting based on hypoxia and proliferative responseR01CA136927 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JERAJ, ROBERT · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136927NIH HHS R01 CA136927University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center P30CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIB) are extracted from medical images in radiomics for a variety of purposes including noninvasive disease detection, cancer monitoring, and precision medicine. The existing methods for QIB extraction tend to be ad hoc and not reproducible. In this article, a general and flexible statistical approach is proposed for handling up to three-dimensional medical images and reasonably capturing features with respect to specific spatial patterns. In particular, a model-based spatial process decomposition is developed where the random weights are unique to individual patients for component functions common across patients. Model fitting and selection are based on maximum likelihood, while feature extractions are via optimal prediction of the underlying true image. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the properties of the proposed methodology. For illustration, a cancer image data set is analyzed and QIBs are extracted in association with a clinical endpoint.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrecision MedicineBiomarkersbiomarkermedical imagemultiresolution modelradiomicsspatial statistics

Identifiers

PMID33336451
PMCPMC8848296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.