Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336423›Full record

ArticleEquine veterinary journal2021

Risk factors for bit-related lesions in Finnish trotting horses.

Kati Tuomola, Nina Mäki-Kihniä, Anna Valros, Anna Mykkänen, Minna Kujala-Wirth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Racehorse welfare across a training season.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rein tension in harness trotters during on-track exercise.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kati TuomolaResearch Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-1458
Nina Mäki-KihniäIndependent Researcher, Pori, Finland.
Anna ValrosResearch Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-3346
Anna MykkänenDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-8983
Minna Kujala-WirthDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-7583
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity Consortium of Pori · FI

Funding

Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of HelsinkiEläinlääketieteen Tutkimuksen Tukisäätiö The Finnish Veterinary Foundation (Mercedes Zachariassen Foundation)Juliana von Wendtin Säätiö (Juliana von Wendt Foundation)Orionin Tutkimussäätiö (Orion Research Foundation)Suomen Hippos ryThe Finnish Foundation of Veterinary Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBit-related lesions in competition horses have been documented, but little evidence exists concerning their potential risk factors.

objectivesTo explore potential risk factors for oral lesions in Finnish trotters. STUDY

designCross-sectional study.

methodsThe rostral part of the mouth of 261 horses (151 Standardbreds, 78 Finnhorses and 32 ponies) was examined after a harness race. Information on bit type, equipment and race performance was collected.

resultsA multivariable logistic regression model of Standardbreds and Finnhorses showed a higher risk of moderate or severe oral lesion status associated with horses wearing a Crescendo bit (n = 38, OR 3.6, CI 1.4-8.9), a mullen mouth regulator bit (n = 25, OR 9.9, CI 2.2-45) or a straight plastic bit (n = 14, OR 13.7, CI 1.75-110) compared with horses wearing a snaffle trotting bit (n = 98, P = .002). Bar lesions (67 horses) were more common in horses wearing unjointed bits than in horses wearing jointed bits (Fisher's exact test P < .001). Lesions in the buccal area and the inner lip commissures were not associated with bit type. Using a tongue-tie or an overcheck, galloping, placement in the top three or money earned in the race were not associated with lesion risk. MAIN LIMITATIONS: The sample size for certain bit types was insufficient for statistical analysis.

conclusionsModerate and severe oral lesion status was more common in horses wearing a Crescendo bit, a mullen mouth regulator bit or a straight plastic bit than in horses wearing a single-jointed snaffle trotting bit. However, lesions were observed regardless of bit type. Further studies on rein tension, the interaction between bit type and rein tension and prevention of mouth lesions in trotters are warranted.

Indexed as

MouthAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFinlandHorsesRisk Factorsbitharness racinghorse, animal welfareoral lesiontrotter

Identifiers

PMID33336423
PMCPMC8518388
OpenAlexW3113019651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.