Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336403›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2021

Incidence of occupational contact dermatitis in healthcare workers: a systematic review.

F Larese Filon, M Pesce, M S Paulo, T Loney, A Modenese, S M John, S Kezic, J Macan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges in diagnosing occupational allergic contact dermatitis: a case report.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

F Larese FilonClinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-0417
M PesceClinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
M S PauloInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
T LoneyCollege of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-6587
A ModeneseDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
S M JohnDepartment Dermatology, Environmental Medicine, Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
S KezicCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-4547
J MacanInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Trieste · ITInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health · HRMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences · AENetherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NLOsnabrück University · DEUnited Arab Emirates University · AEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) can be considered at an increased risk of developing occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) due to repetitive hand washing with soaps and disinfectants and extended use of gloves for many hours during the day. The aim of this study was to summarize the incidence of OCD in HCWs. We searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE (1980-present), EMBASE (1980-present) and Cochrane Library (1992-present) through May 2020 using the search term 'incidence of contact dermatitis in HCWs' according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Overall, 16 studies (six cohorts; 10 register-based) with follow-up periods between 1987 and 2013 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of OCD reported in studies using registers of occupational diseases ranged from 0.6 to 6.7 per 10 000 person-years. The cohort studies reported incidence from 15.9 to 780.0 per 10 000 person-years; the incidence was higher in studies which included apprentice nurses. A higher incidence was also observed amongst dental practitioners, particularly dental technicians and nurses, compared to other HCWs. Studies reporting incidence data are very scarce and results differed by study design, type of contact dermatitis and investigated HCWs. Our study highlighted the dearth of high-quality data on the incidence of OCD and the possible underestimation of disease burden. Prospective cohort studies with harmonized designs, especially exposure assessment and outcome ascertainment, are required to provide more accurate, valid and recent estimates of the incidence of OCD. A high incidence amongst specific occupational groups suggests the need to undertake intervention studies with a focus on prevention, particularly during pandemics such as COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dermatitis, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureDentistsHealth PersonnelHumansIncidenceProfessional RoleProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33336403
PMCPMC8248138
OpenAlexW3112138685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.