Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336385›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical investigation2021

Diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermal imaging for detecting COVID-19 infection in minimally symptomatic patients.

Mario A Martinez-Jimenez, Victor M Loza-Gonzalez, E Samuel Kolosovas-Machuca, Mercedes E Yanes-Lane, Ana Sofia Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose L Ramirez-GarciaLuna

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Smartphone apps in the COVID-19 pandemic.Nature biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 classification using thermal images.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An Overview of Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Screenings during Pandemic Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mario A Martinez-JimenezEmergency Department, Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto", San Luis Potosi, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-849X
Victor M Loza-GonzalezGabinete de Termografia Potosino, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
E Samuel Kolosovas-MachucaGabinete de Termografia Potosino, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-8655
Mercedes E Yanes-LaneDepartment of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-6958
Ana Sofia Ramirez-GarciaLunaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0915-4052
Jose L Ramirez-GarciaLunaGabinete de Termografia Potosino, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-9762
Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí · MXMcGill University · CAInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite being widely used as a screening tool, a rigorous scientific evaluation of infrared thermography for the diagnosis of minimally symptomatic patients suspected of having COVID-19 infection has not been performed.

methodsA consecutive sample of 60 adult individuals with a history of close contact with COVID-19 infected individuals and mild respiratory symptoms for less than 7 days and 20 confirmed COVID-19 negative healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Infrared thermograms of the face were obtained with a mobile camera, and RT-PCR was used as the reference standard test to diagnose COVID-19 infection. Temperature values and distribution of the face of healthy volunteers and patients with and without COVID-19 infection were then compared.

resultsThirty-four patients had an RT-PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and 26 had negative test results. The temperature asymmetry between the lacrimal caruncles and the forehead was significantly higher in COVID-19 positive individuals. Through a random forest analysis, a cut-off value of 0.55°C was found to discriminate with an 82% accuracy between patients with and without COVID-19 confirmed infection.

conclusionsAmong adults with a history of COVID-19 exposure and mild respiratory symptoms, a temperature asymmetry of ≥ 0.55°C between the lacrimal caruncle and the forehead is highly suggestive of COVID-19 infection. This finding questions the widespread use of the measurement of absolute temperature values of the forehead as a COVID-19 screening tool.

Indexed as

Body TemperatureEyeForeheadAdultCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingFemaleHumansInfrared RaysMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19diagnosismachine learningscreeningthermography

Identifiers

PMID33336385
PMCPMC7883263
OpenAlexW3110784375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.