Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336324›Full record

ArticleThe patient2021

What Are the Preferences of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis for Treatment Modification? A Scoping Review.

Suz Jack Chan, Hui Yee Yeo, Lisa K Stamp, Gareth J Treharne, Carlo A Marra

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suz Jack ChanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3490-9987
Hui Yee YeoDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lisa K StampDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-2912
Gareth J TreharneDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-2995
Carlo A MarraSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. carlo.marra@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-2625-2121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOptimal care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients entails regular assessment of disease activity and appropriate adjustment of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) until a predefined treatment goal is achieved. This raises questions about the approach to treatment decision making among RA patients and their preference for associated treatment changes. We aimed to systematically identify and synthesize the available evidence of RA patients' preferences regarding DMARD modification with an emphasis on escalating, tapering, stopping, or switching of DMARDs.

methodsA scoping review was undertaken to gauge the breadth of evidence from the range of studies relating to RA patients' preferences for DMARD modification. Pertinent databases were searched for relevant studies published between 1988 and 2019. Conventional content analysis was applied to generate themes about how patients perceive changes to their RA treatment.

resultsOf the 1730 distinct articles identified, 32 were included for review. Eight studies investigated RA patients' perceptions of switching to other DMARDs, 18 studies reported RA patients' preferences for escalating treatment, and six studies explored the possibility of tapering or stopping of biologic DMARDs. Four overarching themes relating to RA patients' preferences for treatment modification were identified: (i) patient satisfaction, (ii) patients' beliefs, (iii) information needs, and (iv) patient-clinician relationships.

conclusionUptake of treatment changes in clinical practice can be improved by understanding how RA patients approach the decision to modify their treatment and how this relates to their satisfaction, beliefs, information needs, and relationships with clinicians. Future work is needed to systematically determine the significance of these factors in RA patients' decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDatabases, FactualHumansAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.