Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336231›Full record

ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2021

The Effect of Baseline Performance and Age on Cognitive Training Improvements in Older Adults: A Qualitative Review.

J S Shaw, S M H Hosseini

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. How musical rhythm training improves short-term memory for faces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S ShawSM Hadi Hosseini, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305-5795, USA, Tel: (650) 723-5798, Email: hosseiny@stanford.edu.
S M H Hosseini
Stanford University · US

Funding

A Novel Neuromonitoring Guided Cognitive Intervention for Targeted Enhancement of Working MemoryR61MH119289 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HOSSEINI, HADI · 2019 to 2021
$787k
The influence of multi-domain cognitive training on large-scale structural and functional brain networks in MCIK25AG050759 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HOSSEINI, HADI · 2016 to 2020
$739k
A Wearable Optical Imaging System for Daily Monitoring of Prefrontal Activity in ADHDR21MH123873 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOWDEN, AUDREY KYNSELLA, HOSSEINI, HADI · 2020 to 2020
$443k
Multi-dimensional network framework for AD detection and progressionR21AG064263 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HOSSEINI, HADI · 2019 to 2020
$430k
NIA NIH HHS K25 AG050759NIA NIH HHS R21 AG064263NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH123873NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH119289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Findings that the brain is capable of plasticity up until old age have led to interest in the use of cognitive training as a potential intervention to delay the onset of dementia. However, individuals participating in training regimens differ greatly with respect to their outcomes, demonstrating the importance of considering individual differences, in particular age and baseline performance in a cognitive domain, when evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive training. In this review, we summarize existing literature on cognitive training in adults across the domains of episodic memory, working memory and the task-switching component of executive functioning to clarify the picture on the impact of age and baseline performance on cognitive training-related improvements. Studies targeting episodic memory induced greater improvements in younger adults with more intact cognitive abilities, explained in part by factors specific to episodic memory training. By contrast, older, lower baseline performance adults improved most in several studies targeting working memory in older individuals as well as in the majority of studies targeting executive functioning, suggesting the preservation of neural plasticity in these domains until very old age. Our findings can have important implications for informing the design of future interventions for enhancing cognitive functions in individuals at the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's Disease and potentially delaying the clinical onset of Alzheimer's Disease. Future research should more clearly stratify individuals according to their baseline cognitive abilities and assign specialized, skill-specific cognitive training regimens in order to directly answer the question of how individual differences impact training effectiveness.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionMemory, EpisodicAgedAge FactorsAgingHumansMemory, Short-TermQualitative Researchagingbaseline performanceCognitive trainingindividual differences

Identifiers

PMID33336231
PMCPMC8290874
OpenAlexW3093964299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.