ArticleMetabolism open2020
Aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose- influence on the metabolism of
Article in Metabolism open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sucralose and the Gut-Immune Axis: Emerging Evidence Linking Dysbiosis, Barrier Alterations, and Implications for Colitis and Colorectal Cancer Immunotherapy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Re-evaluation of sucralose (E 955) as a food additive and evaluation of a new application on extension of use of sucralose (E 955) in fine bakery wares.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Recombinant Expression and Antimicrobial Mechanism of Cysteine-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides fromMarine drugs · 2026Article
- The multi-omic basis for hepatic encephalopathy recurrence: Analysis of the THEMATIC trial.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Review
- Does maternal consumption of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners result in offspring hypertension?Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Intestinal dysbiosis associated with non-nutritive sweeteners intake: an effect without a cause?Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Unveiling the profound influence of sucralose on metabolism and its role in shaping obesity trends.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- Artificial sweeteners inhibit multidrug-resistant pathogen growth and potentiate antibiotic activity.EMBO molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Non-nutritive sweeteners and their impacts on the gut microbiome and host physiology.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Impact of Maternal Intake of Artificial Sweetener, Acesulfame-K, on Metabolic and Reproductive Health Outcomes in Male and Female Mouse Offspring.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gut microbes play a crucial role in the maintenance of human health. Components in the diet of the host affect their metabolism and diversity. Here, we investigated the influences of three commonly used non-caloric artificial sweeteners-aspartame, acesulfame K and sucralose-on the growth and metabolism of an omnipresent gut microbe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.