Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336121›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2020

Associations between tobacco use patterns and demographic characteristics of sexual minority and heterosexual youth: Results from a nationwide online survey.

Joy L Hart, S Lee Ridner, Lindsey A Wood, Kandi L Walker, Allison Groom, Anshula Kesh, Robyn L Landry, Thomas J Payne, Jennie Z Ma, Rose Marie Robertson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Come for the Tobacco, Stay for the Flavor: Flavored Cigarillo-Use Trajectories Among Young Adult Sexual Gender Minority Women.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Influence of Friends on Teen Vaping: A Mixed-Methods Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joy L HartDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
S Lee RidnerCollege of Nursing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, United States.
Lindsey A WoodDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Kandi L WalkerDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Allison GroomTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Anshula KeshTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Robyn L LandryTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Thomas J PayneTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Jennie Z MaTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Rose Marie RobertsonTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Paige E HartSchool of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Aida L GiachelloTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
Thanh-Huyen T VuTobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States.
American Heart Association · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of South Alabama · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYouth are at risk for tobacco use, and previous research has pointed to increased vulnerabilities associated with sexual minority identity. For example, LGB youth have increased odds for using tobacco than their heterosexual peers, and bisexual youth have higher odds of smoking than other sexual identity groups. As new tobacco products proliferate and health risks from dual/poly use grow, increased understanding of tobacco use patterns by sexual minority youth is needed.

methodsFor 3117 youth, aged 13-18 years, who completed an online questionnaire in 2017 and identified their sexual orientation [minority (e.g. lesbian/gay, bisexual, or pansexual) vs majority (heterosexual)] and gender, we classified current tobacco use into four categories: e-cigarette only, other product only (such as cigarette, cigar, or smokeless tobacco; not an e-cigarette), dual/poly use, and no use. Analyses were conducted separately for male and female participants. Multinomial logistic regression was employed.

resultsFemale sexual minority youth had nearly twofold odds of dual/ poly tobacco use (OR=1.95; 95% CI: 1.12-3.40), compared to their heterosexual counterparts. For male youth, sexual minority identification was not significantly associated with dual/poly use. No significant differences were found in sexual minority and heterosexual youth e-cigarette only or other tobacco only use groups. Tobacco use patterns also significantly differed by age, race, place of residence, and parental education level.

conclusionsStudy findings reveal greater odds of dual/poly tobacco use for female sexual minority youth. Tailored tobacco prevention and cessation programs or interventions are needed for sexual minority youth most at risk of tobacco use, especially multiple product use.

Indexed as

dual/poly tobacco usee-cigaretteheterosexualsexual minorityyouth

Identifiers

PMID33336121
PMCPMC7737560
OpenAlexW3113165700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.