Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33336117›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2021

Myocardial protection by heparin-based coacervate of FGF10.

Zhouguang Wang, Yan Huang, Yan He, Sinan Khor, Xingxing Zhong, Jian Xiao, Qingsong Ye, Xiaokun Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. ERK1/2 activation in anti-inflammatory effects and underlying signaling mechanisms.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhouguang WangSchool of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Yan HuangSchool of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Yan HeLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Tianyou Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430064, China.
Sinan KhorDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Xingxing ZhongDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Jian XiaoSchool of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Qingsong YeCentre of Regenerative Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Xiaokun LiSchool of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USWuhan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease is still the leading killer all around the world, and its incidence is expected to increase over the next decade. Previous reports have already shown the role of fibroblast growth factor10 (FGF10) in alleviating heart diseases. However, FGF10 has not been used to treat heart diseases because the free protein has short half-life and low bioactivity. Here, an injectable coacervate was designed to protect growth factor from degradation during delivery and the effects of the FGF10 coacervate were studied using a mice acute myocardial infarction (MI) model. As shown in our echocardiographic results, a single injection of FGF10 coacervate effectively inhibited preserved cardiac contractibility and ventricular dilation when compared with free FGF10 and the saline treatment 6 weeks after MI. It is revealed in histological results that the MI induced myocardial inflammation and fibrosis was reduced after FGF10 coacervate treatment. Furthermore, FGF10 coacervate treatment could improve arterioles and capillaries stabilization through increasing the proliferation of endothelial and mural cells. However, with the same dosage, no statistically significant difference was shown between free FGF10, heparin+FGF10 and saline treatment, especially in long term. On another hand, FGF10 coacervate also increased the expression of cardiac-associated the mRNA (cTnT, Cx43 and α-SMA), angiogenic factors (Ang-1 and VEGFA) and decreased the level of inflammatory factor (tumor necrosis factor-α). The downstream signaling of the FGF10 was also investigated, with the western blot results showing that FGF10 coacervate activated the

Indexed as

AngiogenesisCoacervateControlled releaseFibroblast growth factor-10Myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID33336117
PMCPMC7732874
OpenAlexW3113554174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.