ArticleInnovation in aging2020
Initial Evidence for the Efficacy of an Everyday Memory and Metacognitive Intervention.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Everyday memory and metacognitive intervention: a randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025Trial
- Article
- Article
- Contextualizing Caregiver Burden in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Dyadic Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Subjective cognitive decline: Memory complaints, cognitive awareness, and metacognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Review
- Effects of Strategy-Based Memory Training for Older Adults: Do Booster Sessions Prompt Long-Term Benefits?Brain sciences · 2023Article
- A new multidimensional group intervention for cognitive and psychosocial functioning for older adults: Background, content, and process evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Are subjective cognitive complaints associated with executive functions and mental health of older adults?Cognitive processing · 2022Article
- Preliminary Support for a Cognitive Remediation Intervention for Women During the Menopausal Transition: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2021Article
- Fostering Self-Management of Everyday Memory in Older Adults: A New Intervention Approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe objective of this paper is to demonstrate the efficacy of an Everyday Memory and Metacognitive Intervention (EMMI) designed to improve everyday functioning of older adults. The EMMI emphasizes self-regulation as a behavioral approach to take priority over habitual behaviors that often impede everyday functioning. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis study used a quasi-experimental design (intervention vs waitlist control) to test whether the EMMI improved several aspects of everyday cognition. Thirty-three EMMI participants (
resultsParticipants who received the EMMI reported more memory successes and fewer memory failures over a 10-day measurement period postintervention. In addition, EMMI participants reported significantly higher life satisfaction and better subjective memory at posttest than the control group. Critically, the EMMI participants performed better on a laboratory contact prospective memory task. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The results from this study suggest that the EMMI is a promising approach that has potential to improve everyday memory functioning and perhaps help extend functional independence. Future studies will include randomized controlled trials as well as electronic measurement of memory incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.