ArticleACS photonics2020
Fast
Article in ACS photonics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visualising sub-second dynamics of nanoparticle extravasationbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Near-field enhancement of optical second harmonic generation in hybrid gold-lithium niobate nanostructures.Light, science & applications · 2023Article
- Structural and functional imaging of brains.Science China. Chemistry · 2023Review
- Polarization effects on the fluorescence emission of zebrafish neurons using light-sheet microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- On the Reaction Pathways and Growth Mechanisms of LiNbONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recent advances in nonlinear microscopy: Deep insights and polarized revelations.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2021Review
- FastBiomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Effects of excitation light polarization on fluorescence emission in two-photon light-sheet microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Advancing Versatile Ferroelectric Materials Toward Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two-photon light-sheet microscopy (2P-SPIM) provides a unique combination of advantages for fast and deep fluorescence imaging in live tissues. Detecting coherent signals such as second-harmonic generation (SHG) in 2P-SPIM in addition to fluorescence would open further imaging opportunities. However, light-sheet microscopy involves an orthogonal configuration of illumination and detection that questions the ability to detect coherent signals. Indeed, coherent scattering from micron-sized structures occurs predominantly along the illumination beam. By contrast, point-like sources such as SHG nanocrystals can efficiently scatter light in multiple directions and be detected using the orthogonal geometry of a light-sheet microscope. This study investigates the suitability of SHG light-sheet microscopy (SHG-SPIM) for fast imaging of SHG nanoprobes. Parameters that govern the detection efficiency of KTiOPO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.