Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33335861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

In-Air Electron Streaming Effect for Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy With a 1.5 T Perpendicular Magnetic Field: A Treatment Planning Study.

Hongdong Liu, Shouliang Ding, Bin Wang, Yongbao Li, Ying Sun, Xiaoyan Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongdong LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Shouliang DingState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bin WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yongbao LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ying SunState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the in-air out-of-field electron streaming effect (ESE) for esophageal cancer radiotherapy in the presence of 1.5 T perpendicular magnetic field.

methodsTen esophageal cancer patients treated with conventional Linac were retrospectively enrolled into a cohort of this study, with the prescription of 4,400 cGy/20 fx. All cases received IMRT replanning using Elekta Unity MR-Linac specified Monaco system, denoted as primary plan. To visualize the in-air dose outside the body in Monaco system, an auxiliary structure was created by extending the external structure. For each case, another comparable plan with no magnetic field was created using the same planning parameters. The plan was also recalculated by placing a bolus upon the neck and chin area to investigate its shielding effect for ESE. Dosimetric evaluations of the out-of-field neck and chin skin area and statistical analysis for these plans were then performed.

resultsOut-of-field ESE was also observed in esophageal cancer treatment planning under 1.5 T magnetic field, while totally absent for plans with no magnetic field. On average, the maximum dose to the neck and chin skin area of the primary plan (657.92 ± 69.07 cGy) was higher than that of plan with no magnetic field (281.78 ± 36.59 cGy, p = 0.005) and plan with bolus (398.43 ± 69.19 cGy, p = 0.007). DVH metrics D

conclusionFor MRI guided esophageal cancer radiotherapy, a relatively high out-of-field neck and chin skin doses will be introduced by ESE in the presence of magnetic field. It is therefore recommended to take this into account during the planning phase. Adding bolus could effectively reduce the ESE dose contributions, achieve the shielding effect almost equivalent to the scenario with no magnetic field. Further explorations of measurement verifications for the ESE dose distributions are required.

Indexed as

electron streaming effectesophageal cancerMR guided radiotherapyMR-linacout-of-field dose

Identifiers

PMID33335861
PMCPMC7736404
OpenAlexW3110136751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.