Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33335858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Non-pharmacological Intervention for Cancer-Related Dyspnea.

Patsy Yates, Janet Hardy, Alexandra Clavarino, Kwun M Fong, Geoffrey Mitchell, Helen Skerman, Vanessa Brunelli, Isabella Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Palliative care interventions for thoracic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis identifying the core elements.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Nonpharmacological dyspnoea-relief strategies in lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current Management Options for Dyspnea in Cancer Patients.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patsy YatesQueensland University of Technology, Cancer & Palliative Outcomes Center, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
Janet HardyMater Health Services, Mater Research-The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Alexandra ClavarinoThe University of Queensland, School of Pharmacy, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kwun M FongThe University of Queensland Thoracic Research Center, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Geoffrey MitchellThe University of Queensland, School of Clinical Medicine, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Helen SkermanQueensland University of Technology, Cancer & Palliative Outcomes Center, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
Vanessa BrunelliQueensland University of Technology, Cancer & Palliative Outcomes Center, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
Isabella ZhaoQueensland University of Technology, Cancer & Palliative Outcomes Center, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUMater Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

anxietydyspneanon-pharmacological interventionsnurse-led interventionsrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33335858
PMCPMC7737519
OpenAlexW3109056999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.