Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33335491›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Measuring Clinical Efficacy Through the Lens of Audit Data in Different Adult Eating Disorder Treatment Programmes.

Zhuo Li, Yasemin Dandil, Cindy Toloza, Anna Carr, Oyenike Oyeleye, Emma Kinnaird, Kate Tchanturia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the Impact of Eating Disorder Early Intervention on Young People's Work, Education and Social Functioning.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensory wellbeing workshops for inpatient and day-care patients with anorexia nervosa.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhuo LiDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Yasemin DandilDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Cindy TolozaNational Eating Disorders Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Anna CarrNational Eating Disorders Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Oyenike OyeleyeNational Eating Disorders Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Emma KinnairdDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Kate TchanturiaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

anorexia nervosaautismclinical significancecomorbidityday treatmentefficacyinpatient

Identifiers

PMID33335491
PMCPMC7736031
OpenAlexW3109785776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.