ArticleStatistica Sinica2018
Semiparametric Estimation with Data Missing Not at Random Using an Instrumental Variable.
Article in Statistica Sinica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obtaining personalized predictions from a randomized controlled trial on Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Double Sampling for Informatively Missing Data in Electronic Health Record-Based Comparative Effectiveness Research.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Testing the missing at random assumption in generalized linear models in the presence of instrumental variables.Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications · 2024Article
- Non-parametric inference about mean functionals of non-ignorable non-response data without identifying the joint distribution.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for covariate data imputation in pharmacometrics.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
- Semiparametric Inference for Nonmonotone Missing-Not-at-Random Data: The No Self-Censoring Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- Probabilistic Machine Learning for Healthcare.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2021Review
- Envelope method with ignorable missing data.Electronic journal of statistics · 2021Article
- A Nuisance-Free Inference Procedure Accounting for the Unknown Missingness with Application to Electronic Health Records.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Implementation of Instrumental Variable Bounds for Data Missing Not at Random.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Missing data occur frequently in empirical studies in health and social sciences, often compromising our ability to make accurate inferences. An outcome is said to be missing not at random (MNAR) if, conditional on the observed variables, the missing data mechanism still depends on the unobserved outcome. In such settings, identification is generally not possible without imposing additional assumptions. Identification is sometimes possible, however, if an instrumental variable (IV) is observed for all subjects which satisfies the exclusion restriction that the IV affects the missingness process without directly influencing the outcome. In this paper, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for nonparametric identification of the full data distribution under MNAR with the aid of an IV. In addition, we give sufficient identification conditions that are more straightforward to verify in practice. For inference, we focus on estimation of a population outcome mean, for which we develop a suite of semiparametric estimators that extend methods previously developed for data missing at random. Specifically, we propose inverse probability weighted estimation, outcome regression-based estimation and doubly robust estimation of the mean of an outcome subject to MNAR. For illustration, the methods are used to account for selection bias induced by HIV testing refusal in the evaluation of HIV seroprevalence in Mochudi, Botswana, using interviewer characteristics such as gender, age and years of experience as IVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.