Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33335221›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Currently monitored microplastics pose negligible ecological risk to the global ocean.

Ricardo Beiras, Alexandre M Schönemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Physiological and Multi-Omics Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Would the Oceans Become Toxic to Humanity Due to Use and Mismanagement of Plastics?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Biofilms on Trace Metal Adsorption on Plastics in Freshwater Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ricardo BeirasDepartment of Ecology and Animal Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, University of Vigo, 6 36310, Vigo, Galicia, Spain. rbeiras@uvigo.gal.
Alexandre M SchönemannDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, University of Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Galicia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the rise in plastic production, microplastics (MP) dominate marine debris, and their impact on marine ecosystems will likely increase. However a global quantitative assessment of this risk is still lacking. We conducted an ecological risk assessment of MP in the global ocean by comparing the thresholds of biological effects with the probability of exposure to those concentrations, according to plastic density data adjusted to a log-normal distribution. Levels of MP from 100 to 5000 µm span from < 0.0001 to 1.89 mg/L, whereas the most conservative safe concentration is 13.8 mg/L, and probability of exposure is p = 0.00004. Therefore large MP pose negligible global risk. However, MP bioavailability, translocation and toxicity increase as size decreases, and particles < 10 µm are not identified by current monitoring methods. Future research should target the lowest size fractions of MP and nanoplastics, and use in toxicity testing environmental plastic particles rather than engineered materials.

Identifiers

PMID33335221
PMCPMC7746749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.